1989
DOI: 10.1128/jb.171.2.874-879.1989
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Involvement of multiple genetic determinants in high-level methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus

Abstract: A methicillin-susceptible, novobiocin-resistant strain of Staphylococcus aureus (RN2677; methicillin MIC, 0.8 jig/ml) was transformed with DNA prepared from highly and homogeneously methicillin-resistant S. aureus strains (methicillin MIC, .400 ,ug/ml) or from heterogeneous strains in which the majority of cells had a low level of resistance (methicillin MIC, 6.3 tug/ml). All methicillin-resistant transformants showed low and heterogeneous resistance (methicillin MIC, 3.1 pg/ml) irrespective of the resistance … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
118
0
2

Year Published

1991
1991
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
9
118
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The complete deletion of psr could remove the stronger promoter but also other sequences in the ORF or downstream of the ORF which might contribute to attenuation of pbp5 gene transcription. Regulation of PBP expression by genetic elements has also been reported to occur in E. coli (2,31) and in methicillinresistant staphylococci (3,19,25,26), but the mechanism by which such control is exerted has not been elucidated. In E. coli, the synthesis of PBPs lb and 3 appears to be negatively controlled by mre genes, which are located at a distance of 60 min from these PBP genes in the chromosome map (31), whereas overproduction of PBPs 2 and 5 is caused by mutation in the rodA gene, which is located in the same operon as these PBP genes (2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complete deletion of psr could remove the stronger promoter but also other sequences in the ORF or downstream of the ORF which might contribute to attenuation of pbp5 gene transcription. Regulation of PBP expression by genetic elements has also been reported to occur in E. coli (2,31) and in methicillinresistant staphylococci (3,19,25,26), but the mechanism by which such control is exerted has not been elucidated. In E. coli, the synthesis of PBPs lb and 3 appears to be negatively controlled by mre genes, which are located at a distance of 60 min from these PBP genes in the chromosome map (31), whereas overproduction of PBPs 2 and 5 is caused by mutation in the rodA gene, which is located in the same operon as these PBP genes (2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have used randomly generated mutants of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strains that demonstrate a reduction in the methicillin MIC, followed by biochemical analysis, to define the genes linked to cell wall biosynthesis (65,66,164,217). A large number of genes appear to be involved in staphylococcal cell wall precursor production (66).…”
Section: Understanding Vancomycin Resistance: the Staphylococcal Cellmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comienzos de los años 1980 se observó que si bien todas las células de MRSA en una población dada poseían el gen mecA, la CIM de meticilina variaba desde unos pocos microgramos por mililitro por encima del punto de corte de susceptibilidad hasta niveles cientos de veces más altos, hecho que se atribuye a la expresión diferencial de otros determinantes genéticos involucrados en la resistencia, tales como el gen femA (51). Se postula que el uso de carbapenems y cefalosporinas de tercera generación para tratar estas cepas MRSA heterogéneas, que al principio aparecían susceptibles, condujo a la selección de las subpoblaciones más resistentes y al predominio de MRSA homogéneo (52).…”
Section: Resistencia Intermedia Heterogénea a Vancomicina: Cepas Hvisaunclassified