By virtue of its frontal and hippocampal connections, the retrosplenial cortex is uniquely placed to support cognition. Here, we tested whether the retrosplenial cortex is required for frontal tasks analogous to the Stroop Test, i.e., for the ability to select between conflicting responses and inhibit responding to task-irrelevant cues. Rats first acquired two instrumental conditional discriminations, one auditory and one visual, set in two distinct contexts. As a result, rats were rewarded for pressing either the right or left lever when a particular auditory or visual signal was present. In extinction, rats received compound stimuli that either comprised the auditory and visual elements that signaled the same lever response (congruent) or signaled different lever responses (incongruent) during training. On conflict (incongruent) trials, lever selection by sham-operated animals followed the stimulus element that had previously been trained in that same test context, whereas animals with retrosplenial cortex lesions failed to disambiguate the conflicting response cues. Subsequent experiments demonstrated that this abnormality on conflict trials was not due to a failure in distinguishing the contexts. Rather, these data reveal the selective involvement of the rat retrosplenial cortex in response conflict, and so extend the frontal system underlying cognitive control.Throughout life we must select between conflicting responses. Increased demands on cognitive control occur when multiple responses may be appropriate, when in the presence of ambiguous stimuli, or when a dominant but task-inappropriate response should be suppressed. The Stroop Test (Stroop 1935) embodies the problems of cognitive control in the presence of conflicting responses. The Stroop task requires participants to read a word or name the color of the ink with which the word is written. Color-word combinations comprise either congruent (e.g., the word "red" in red ink) or incongruent word and ink combinations (e.g., the word "red" written in blue ink) and participants must use the task-relevant attribute of the compound (e.g., name the word) to control responding while ignoring the irrelevant attribute (e.g., ignore the color of the ink