2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2012.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Involvement of the CA1 GABAA receptors in ACPA-induced impairment of spatial and non-spatial novelty detection in mice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
5
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some other studies have reported similar effects of intra-CA1 bicuculline on memory retention (Zarrindast et al, 2002) and the detection of spatial change and nonspatial novelty (Yousefi et al, 2013). Some other studies have reported similar effects of intra-CA1 bicuculline on memory retention (Zarrindast et al, 2002) and the detection of spatial change and nonspatial novelty (Yousefi et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Some other studies have reported similar effects of intra-CA1 bicuculline on memory retention (Zarrindast et al, 2002) and the detection of spatial change and nonspatial novelty (Yousefi et al, 2013). Some other studies have reported similar effects of intra-CA1 bicuculline on memory retention (Zarrindast et al, 2002) and the detection of spatial change and nonspatial novelty (Yousefi et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In addition, GABAergic regulation of neuronal architecture has been reported. A hippocampal GABA A receptor agonist has been shown to impair spatial memory [27]. Prior studies in mutant mice have shown that enhanced GABA B receptor activity reduces the expression of immediate-early genes that encode the protein activity-regulated cytoskeleton-associated protein (Arc) which is essential for synaptic plasticity and memory [28, 29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The apparatus used for the study was the same as in previous reports [30,31]. It was a metal circular box, 60 cm in diameter with a 20 cm-high wall.…”
Section: Description Of the Experimental Apparatusmentioning
confidence: 99%