2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.10.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Involvement of the middle frontal gyrus in language switching as revealed by electrical stimulation mapping and functional magnetic resonance imaging in bilingual brain tumor patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For opioids, the right angular gyrus and left middle frontal gyrus stood out as two brain areas with the highest concentration of effects. As both areas are multimodal association areas involved in a range of functions including language, number processing, spatial attention, theory of mind for the angular gyrus (Seghier, 2013) and language, executive control for the left middle frontal gyrus (Sierpowska et al, 2018), this finding agrees with previous reports of nonspecific disruptions of attention, cognitive, and regulatory functions associated with prenatal opioids exposure (Nygaard, Slinning, Moe, & Walhovd, 2016). Exposures to alcohol and marijuana prenatally have been both associated with a range of attention, memory, and executive control problems (Coles, 2011; Fried & Smith, 2001; Goldschmidt, Day, & Richardson, 2000), which is in part consistent with our observed more scattered distribution of effects in their corresponding heat maps.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…For opioids, the right angular gyrus and left middle frontal gyrus stood out as two brain areas with the highest concentration of effects. As both areas are multimodal association areas involved in a range of functions including language, number processing, spatial attention, theory of mind for the angular gyrus (Seghier, 2013) and language, executive control for the left middle frontal gyrus (Sierpowska et al, 2018), this finding agrees with previous reports of nonspecific disruptions of attention, cognitive, and regulatory functions associated with prenatal opioids exposure (Nygaard, Slinning, Moe, & Walhovd, 2016). Exposures to alcohol and marijuana prenatally have been both associated with a range of attention, memory, and executive control problems (Coles, 2011; Fried & Smith, 2001; Goldschmidt, Day, & Richardson, 2000), which is in part consistent with our observed more scattered distribution of effects in their corresponding heat maps.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…These pathological behaviors are due to damage of distinct regions within the BLC network, predominantly subcortical (basal ganglia) and/or frontal areas and their connections with striatal structures. The role of these areas in language switching has been also demonstrated by intraoperative electrical stimulation of the MFG and left caudate …”
Section: Overlap Between Ec and Blc Networkmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Results showed that the three types of words elicited similar activation patterns in brain regions for general cognitive control (i.e., anterior cingulate cortex and bilateral middle frontal gyrus) (Abutalebi & Green, 2007;Seo, Stocco, & Prat, 2018;Sierpowska et al, 2018) and for word reading (i.e., the bilateral inferior frontal gyrus, occipitoparietal cortex, and occipitotemporal cortex) (Bolger et al, 2005;Cattinelli, Borghese, Gallucci, & Paulesu, 2013;Price, 2012) (Figure 2a-c). Results showed that the three types of words elicited similar activation patterns in brain regions for general cognitive control (i.e., anterior cingulate cortex and bilateral middle frontal gyrus) (Abutalebi & Green, 2007;Seo, Stocco, & Prat, 2018;Sierpowska et al, 2018) and for word reading (i.e., the bilateral inferior frontal gyrus, occipitoparietal cortex, and occipitotemporal cortex) (Bolger et al, 2005;Cattinelli, Borghese, Gallucci, & Paulesu, 2013;Price, 2012) (Figure 2a-c).…”
Section: Neural Activations For Chinese English and Artificial Lamentioning
confidence: 94%