“…All studies were attempting to answer whether mites were genetically different depending on the host they were infecting and/or whether biogeographical separation existed. General conclusions from all gene targets include that (i) microsatellites identify distinctive host separation [ 35 , 47 , 49 – 52 ], (ii) COX1 and 16S are consistent with host and location separation, with human specific mites indicating higher species separation based on location according to COX1 [ 32 , 35 , 36 , 42 , 53 , 54 ], (iii) ITS-2 and 12S should only be used for S. scabiei identification and that a single species of mite infects all animals and humans [ 32 , 34 , 37 , 38 , 42 , 53 , 55 , 56 ], and (iv) genes encoding for glutathione S-transferase-1 and voltage-sensitive sodium channels (GST1 and VSSC, respectively) might be a good indicator for host-related variation and resistance [ 57 ]. Interestingly, Erster et al [ 57 ] found that COX1 did not play a role in mite host-specific separation in this particular study, which is contrast to other COX1 studies [ 32 ].…”