2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-009-1559-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Involvement of α1-adrenoceptors in conditioned place preference supported by nicotine in rats

Abstract: The activation of alpha1-ARs is one of the mechanisms that code for the incentive motivational value of nicotine. It participates also in the short-term, but not the long-term, control of behavior by nicotine-paired stimuli. The latter effect does not result from disruption by prazosin of either memory for the nicotine-cue association or reconsolidation processes at recall. Thus, differences exist in the neurobiological mechanisms that contribute to the incentive motivational value of nicotine and the short- a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are consistent with previous results demonstrating that adolescents are more sensitive than adults to the rewarding properties of drugs of abuse (Brenhouse & Andersen, 2008;Zakharova, Wade, & Izenwasser, 2009), including nicotine (Torres et al, 2008). While CPP conditioning procedures often use an unbiased design (Cunningham, Henderson, & Bormann, 1998;Forget, Hamon, & Thi ebot, 2009;Wilkinson & Bevins, 2008), the current experiment used a biased two-compartment design in which nicotine was paired with the initially nonpreferred compartment of the apparatus (Brielmaier, McDonald, & Smith, 2012). While not supporting the emergence of significant nicotine CPP in adult males, this procedure was very sensitive to the expression of age differences in nicotine CPP, with robust nicotineinduced increases in time spent in the paired side among the adolescent animals.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These findings are consistent with previous results demonstrating that adolescents are more sensitive than adults to the rewarding properties of drugs of abuse (Brenhouse & Andersen, 2008;Zakharova, Wade, & Izenwasser, 2009), including nicotine (Torres et al, 2008). While CPP conditioning procedures often use an unbiased design (Cunningham, Henderson, & Bormann, 1998;Forget, Hamon, & Thi ebot, 2009;Wilkinson & Bevins, 2008), the current experiment used a biased two-compartment design in which nicotine was paired with the initially nonpreferred compartment of the apparatus (Brielmaier, McDonald, & Smith, 2012). While not supporting the emergence of significant nicotine CPP in adult males, this procedure was very sensitive to the expression of age differences in nicotine CPP, with robust nicotineinduced increases in time spent in the paired side among the adolescent animals.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…As was hypothesized, adolescents displayed CPP at all doses of nicotine, whereas significant place conditioning was not evident in adults (see Fig. While CPP conditioning procedures often use an unbiased design (Cunningham, Henderson, & Bormann, 1998;Forget, Hamon, & Thi ebot, 2009;Wilkinson & Bevins, 2008), the current experiment used a biased two-compartment design in which nicotine was paired with the initially nonpreferred compartment of the apparatus (Brielmaier, McDonald, & Smith, 2012). These findings are consistent with previous results demonstrating that adolescents are more sensitive than adults to the rewarding properties of drugs of abuse (Brenhouse & Andersen, 2008;Zakharova, Wade, & Izenwasser, 2009), including nicotine (Torres et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…It is unlikely that these drugs produced aversive effects, which might have inhibited 50-kHz calling. Clonidine, for example, is self-administered IV (Davis and Smith, 1977) and induces CPP (Asin and Wirtshafter, 1985;Cervo et al, 1993) in rats, whereas prazosin seems motivationally neutral (Forget et al, 2009;Zarrindast et al, 2002). The inhibitory effect of prazosin is potentially interesting in view of its reported failure to block either the discriminative stimulus effects of AMPH in rats (Arnt, 1996;West et al, 1995) or the acquisition of AMPH CPP (Hoffman and Donovan, 1995).…”
Section: Behavioral Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, we do not believe it was an issue. Indeed, microdialysis experiments performed in non-human primates or rodents indicate that elevation of dopamine are almost at maximal level at the time-point we selected for the beginning of the scanning time, and elevation of dopamine are prolonged and can last at least 2 hours in some reports (Domino and Tsukada, 2009;Forget et al, 2009). We also did not use denicotinized cigarette as a control.…”
Section: (C) Expectancy Factor (Tobacco Craving Questionnaire Tcq)mentioning
confidence: 99%