Involving Older Adults in Developing Physical Activity Interventions to Promote Engagement: a Literature Review

Abstract

Physical activity (PA) is associated with health benefits, with policy across the world focussing on increasing participation. Yet uptake and adherence to PA amongst older adults remains below the recommended 150 min/week. This review aims to identify how older adults have been involved in the design, delivery, implementation and promotion of interventions to promote PA uptake and adherence, and whether there are any recorded benefits of this involvement. Systematic searches of CINAHL, Embase, HMIC, MEDLINE, PsychINFO, Social Policy and Practice and the SSCI were undertaken. Inclusion/exclusion criteria were: (i) Original research; (ii) older adults, 50+; (iii) community dwelling; (iv) involvement in design, delivery, implementation or promotion of interventions. A narrative synthesis of ten studies is presented, following systematic methods, reporting study design and intervention type; participants and context; nature of involvement; effectiveness of interventions. Six different types of involvement were evident: (i) consultation; (ii) cooperation; (iii) co-learning; (iv) collaboration; (v) peer leadership and (vi) mentoring. Levels of success were reported, yet specific factors were difficult to isolate. The studies reported complex interventions which were reported as successful. However, it is difficult to state whether success was a result of the older adults' involvement, as the benefits of involving older adults were not tracked or reported. Future research should be clear about the nature of involvement, the context in which research takes place, and the description of action and outcomes. Policy makers should consider the advantages to be gained from involving older adults in intervention development.

Physical Activity in the Southern Great Plain Region of Hungary: The Role of Sociodemographics and Body Mass Index

“…We found that the age group of 18–29 years was the most active. Several studies have shown that physical activity decreases with age and interventions are required in the younger age groups [ 33 ]. However, in our study, the age group of 30–49 had significantly lower odds of participating in moderate physical activity than the age group of 65.…”

Knowledge mobilization in bridging patient‐practitioner‐researcher boundaries: A systematic integrative review

“…However, the actual mechanisms of ‘engagement’ expected in KMb (Abma et al., 2017) and PPI (IAP2 International Federation, 2018) often do not match Community Based Research expectations. However, in the current climate of KMb, particularly when creating tools or influencing policy, consultative approaches may be sufficient to achieve KMb outcomes (Boulton et al., 2019; Boutin‐Foster et al., 2008; South & Cattan, 2014). KMb activities, particularly those that involve building knowledge, do not always need to be fully empowering.…”

A Critical Review on New Approaches for Chronic Disease Prevention in Brazil and Canada: From Wholistic Dietary Guidelines to Physical Activity Security

“…Overall, the first interventions focused on adulthood used to address only young and middle-aged adults ( 138 , 139 ). However, with the inversion in the age pyramid, the older population has been receiving increasing attention, with several guidelines and other PA initiatives being tailored to older adults ( 140 , 141 ). The WHO guidelines on PA have a specific chapter for this population ( 43 ).…”