2016
DOI: 10.1515/gej-2015-0068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inward and Outward Foreign Direct Investment and Inequality: Evidence from a Group of Middle-Income Countries

Abstract: Using panel data of a group of 39 middle-income countries over 1981–2006, this paper examines how globalization in general and inward and outward FDI in particular affects inequality. Depending on geographical region and economic system, each component of globalization affects inequality in three groups of countries in different ways: open to inward FDI tends to affect income distribution adversely in transition economies and Latin American countries, but marginally improves income distribution in countries of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…INEQ=α+β1ECONGLOBAL+βxZx+εwhere INEQ is a measure of income inequality (see Section 4 on how we distinguish between different inequality measures), ECONGLOBAL is a measure of economic globalisation, Z is a vector of other explanatory variables, and ε is the error term. For example, papers that used globalisation measures that do not exclusively consider the dimension of economic globalisation but a hybrid measure with political and/or social dimensions had to be excluded (e.g., Huang, Teng, & Tsai, 2016). Likewise, we did not include studies that focussed on the impact of globalisation on regional inequality (e.g., Ma, 2006) or other non‐relevant inequality measures as the dependent variable.…”
Section: Meta‐analysis: Data and Summary Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…INEQ=α+β1ECONGLOBAL+βxZx+εwhere INEQ is a measure of income inequality (see Section 4 on how we distinguish between different inequality measures), ECONGLOBAL is a measure of economic globalisation, Z is a vector of other explanatory variables, and ε is the error term. For example, papers that used globalisation measures that do not exclusively consider the dimension of economic globalisation but a hybrid measure with political and/or social dimensions had to be excluded (e.g., Huang, Teng, & Tsai, 2016). Likewise, we did not include studies that focussed on the impact of globalisation on regional inequality (e.g., Ma, 2006) or other non‐relevant inequality measures as the dependent variable.…”
Section: Meta‐analysis: Data and Summary Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the United R- ECONOMY, 2022, 8(4), 340-355 doi: 10.15826/recon.2022.8.4 In the last four decades, there has been a substantial debate on whether the relationship between international trade and OFDI is complementary or substitutive. Many empirical studies have examined this relationship in different strand of literatures using single country analysis (Rehman & Noman, 2021;Greaney & Kiyota, 2020;Tham et al, 2018;Chiappini 2016), group analysis for developed and developing countries (Sabir et al, 2019), as well as literature examining FDI inflow in country income (Joshua et al, 2020;Araujo et al, 2017;Huang et al, 2016). This has led to inconclusive results in large numbers of empirical studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%