2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2006.tb00289.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inwardly rectifying potassium channels (Kir) in central nervous system glia: a special role for Kir4.1 in glial functions

Abstract: A high selective membrane permeability to potassium ions (K + ) and a strongly negative resting membrane potential (RMP) are considered fundamental properties of glial cells [1,2]. Glia express a wide range of K + channels, but inwardly rectifying K + channels (Kir) are predominantly responsible for the high K + permeabili- AbstractGlia in the central nervous system (CNS) express diverse inward rectifying potassium channels (Kir). The major function of Kir is in establishing the high potassium (K + ) selectiv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
221
1
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 264 publications
(230 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
(169 reference statements)
7
221
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In astrocytes, the inwardly rectifying K 1 channel, Kir4.1, which is regulated by intracellular adenosine triphosphate (ATP), is thought to allow for K 1 influx at negative membrane potentials (for review see Butt and Kalsi, 2006;Hibino et al, 2010;Olsen and Sontheimer, 2008). Genetic inactivation of the Kir4.1 encoding gene, KCNJ10, in animal models substantiated an outstanding role for Kir4.1 in glial K 1 buffering (Djukic et al, 2007;Kofuji et al, 2000).…”
Section: Impact Of Inwardly Rectifying Kmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In astrocytes, the inwardly rectifying K 1 channel, Kir4.1, which is regulated by intracellular adenosine triphosphate (ATP), is thought to allow for K 1 influx at negative membrane potentials (for review see Butt and Kalsi, 2006;Hibino et al, 2010;Olsen and Sontheimer, 2008). Genetic inactivation of the Kir4.1 encoding gene, KCNJ10, in animal models substantiated an outstanding role for Kir4.1 in glial K 1 buffering (Djukic et al, 2007;Kofuji et al, 2000).…”
Section: Impact Of Inwardly Rectifying Kmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They affect the electrotonic conductance and repolarisation of the action potential generated at the node by mediating K + outward currents [60]. Glia cells also possess inwardly rectifying potassium channels (K ir 4.1) that support the potassium homeostasis in the extracellular space [7]. Demyelination induces alterations in K + channel expression and distribution, as there is an upregula- currents lead to an intracellular potassium depletion that is assumed to be a first step in apoptotic cascades as it triggers water loss and disinhibition of intracellular proapoptotic enzymes [61].…”
Section: Voltage-gated and K 2p Potassium Channelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The regulation of the immune response is fundamentally dependent on ion channels which are expressed on immune cells and which allow peripheral T lymphocytes to proliferate and to produce inflammatory cytokines [5]. Ion channels on neurons and glia cells affect the mechanisms that induce axonal and neuronal degeneration in white matter of the brain and spinal cord [6,7]. The application of different sodium, potassium and calcium channel inhibitors considerably ameliorates the EAE disease course as well as clinical severity, and it postpones the disease onset after immunization in comparison to sham-treated control animals [5,8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, HERG channels would typically be closed at holding potentials negative to 80 mV, and the activation kinetics and Ba 2+ sensitivity did not match well with the properties of hyperpolarization-activated nonselective cation currents. The family of inward rectifier K + channels is generally divided, on the basis of molecular and electrophysiological attributes, into seven subfamilies (Kir1.0∼ Kir7.0), which have more than 20 members (Doupnik et al, 1995;Nichols & Lopatin, 1997;Butt & Kalsi, 2006). We have not taken a molecular approach or a more detailed electrophysiological characterization of this hyperpolarizationactivated inward current.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%