2021
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.687975
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IOBR: Multi-Omics Immuno-Oncology Biological Research to Decode Tumor Microenvironment and Signatures

Abstract: Recent advances in next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies have triggered the rapid accumulation of publicly available multi-omics datasets. The application of integrated omics to explore robust signatures for clinical translation is increasingly emphasized, and this is attributed to the clinical success of immune checkpoint blockades in diverse malignancies. However, effective tools for comprehensively interpreting multi-omics data are still warranted to provide increased granularity into the intrinsic … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
356
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 608 publications
(405 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
356
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, considering the differences in the reference genomes and gene signatures of immune cells used for quantifying RNA-sequencing data, multiple previous prognostic models may have limitations in the cross-validation of different transcriptional datasets or different cancer types. The measurements of cellular heterogeneity vary due to the frequent updated version of annotation for immune cells and reference genome, which may impede their extensive application and set back the prospect for clinical practice ( Figure S5 ) ( 35 , 36 ). To resolve this issue, we collected and integrated 65 immune cells to establish a robust and comprehensive prognostic signature with the concept of cell pair.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, considering the differences in the reference genomes and gene signatures of immune cells used for quantifying RNA-sequencing data, multiple previous prognostic models may have limitations in the cross-validation of different transcriptional datasets or different cancer types. The measurements of cellular heterogeneity vary due to the frequent updated version of annotation for immune cells and reference genome, which may impede their extensive application and set back the prospect for clinical practice ( Figure S5 ) ( 35 , 36 ). To resolve this issue, we collected and integrated 65 immune cells to establish a robust and comprehensive prognostic signature with the concept of cell pair.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…com/ IOBR/ IOBR). 28 Immun-eScore, Stromalscore, and tumor purity were assessed computationally in RNA-seq data using the ESTIMATE algorithm 29 that uses gene expression signatures to infer the fraction of stromal and immune cells in tumor samples. Other computational algorithms and tools used to estimate the microenvironment were detailed in the online supplemental methods.…”
Section: Gastric Cancer Specimens Derived From Clinical Trialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…40 Other prevalent gene signature scores with respect to the TME, tumor intrinsic pathway, and metabolism were calculated for each sample using the PCA algorithm by IOBR package. 28 Differentially methylated probes analysis Methylation data (β values of Illumina Infinium Human-Methylation450) of The Cancer Genome Atlas of Stomach Adenocarcinoma (TCGA-STAD) patients were obtained through TCGAbiolinks. 32 β values reported by the 450K Illumina platform for each probe were set as the methylation level measurement for the targeted CpG site.…”
Section: Single-sample Gene-set Enrichment Analysis Of Tumor Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the quanTIseq and ESTIMATE algorithms to analyze the immune infiltration levels of cells in TME (26)(27)(28). Immune checkpoint analysis was conducted as well.…”
Section: Tme Drug and Cell Line Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%