“…This process, which incorporatesaphase separation that greatly simplifies product purification, is an attractive replacement for the Sandmeyer approach to iodoarenes that are otherwise difficult to access.The significant efforts devoted to iodoarene synthesiss peak to the central roles these iodinated intermediates play in modern organic chemistry. [1] Al arge number of reagents have been used fore lectrophilic aromatic iodination, [2][3][4][5][6] including N-iodosuccinimide (NIS) [7][8][9][10][11][12] and related NÀIc ompounds, [13][14][15][16][17] iodine monochloride (ICl), [18][19][20] bis(pyridine)-iodonium(I)t etrafluoroborate (Py 2 IBF 4 ), [21,22] dichloroiodates, [23,24] NaI in combination with variouso xidants, [25,26] and silver [12,[27][28][29][30] or mercury [31,32] salts in combination with I 2 .Amultitude of reagents and diverse reaction conditions are required to address ac entral problem in iodoarene synthesis by electrophilica romatic substitution (EAS): the electrophilicity of "I + "r eagents must be matched with the overall "electron-richness" of the arene to obtain selective iodine substitution. Once on the aromatic ring, the iodine substituenti sn ot strongly deactivating (Hammett s p = 0.18, s m = 0.35, s + = 0.14), [33] so trial and error must be used to find an iodine source which is sufficiently aggressive, but not so electrophilict hat multiple electrophilica romatic substitutions take place.…”