Iodine Content of Wild and Farmed Seafood and Its Estimated Contribution to UK Dietary Iodine Intake

Abstract

Iodine is an important nutrient for human health and development, with seafood widely acknowledged as a rich source. Demand from the increasing global population has resulted in the availability of a wider range of wild and farmed seafood. Increased aquaculture production, however, has resulted in changes to feed ingredients that affect the nutritional quality of the final product. The present study assessed the iodine contents of wild and farmed seafood available to UK consumers and evaluated its contribution to current dietary iodine intake. Ninety-five seafood types, encompassing marine and freshwater fish and shellfish, of wild and farmed origins, were purchased from UK retailers and analysed. Iodine contents ranged from 427.4 ± 316.1 to 3.0 ± 1.6 µg·100 g−1 flesh wet weight (mean ± SD) in haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus) and common carp (Cyprinus carpio), respectively, being in the order shellfish > marine fish > freshwater fish, with crustaceans, whitefish (Gadiformes) and bivalves contributing the greatest levels. Overall, wild fish tended to exhibit higher iodine concentrations than farmed fish, with the exception of non-fed aquaculture species (bivalves). However, no significant differences were observed between wild and farmed Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), and turbot (Psetta maxima). In contrast, farmed European seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax) and seabream (Sparus aurata) presented lower, and Atlantic halibut (Hippoglossus hippoglossus) higher, iodine levels than their wild counterparts, most likely due to the type and inclusion level of feed ingredients used. By following UK dietary guidelines for fish consumption, a portion of the highest oily (Atlantic mackerel, Scomber scombrus) and lean (haddock) fish species would provide two-thirds of the weekly recommended iodine intake (980 µg). In contrast, actual iodine intake from seafood consumption is estimated at only 9.4–18.0% of the UK reference nutrient intake (140 µg·day−1) across different age groups and genders, with females obtaining less than their male equivalents.

Bioactive Compounds and Therapeutics from Fish: Revisiting Their Suitability in Functional Foods to Enhance Human Wellbeing

“…In both farmed and wild salmon, omega-3 fatty acids often vary based on the salmon's feed. Sprague et al [ 120 ] reported slight variations in iodine content of farmed and wild fishes. Consumers have different perceptions about farmed and wild fishes.…”

Iodine status of pregnant women from the Republic of Cyprus

“…Our null findings may be explained by small numbers in sub-group analyses within our study and the fact that, as seafood is consumed infrequently, the iodine intake may not be reflected in urine (which reflects the previous 1-2 d of intake (55) ). Our results may also relate to the type of fish consumed and the fact that there is large variation in fish-iodine content between species which is dependent on seawater and mineral composition (56) . Fish intake may be low in pregnancy for a variety of reasons, for example a qualitative study in the UK found that pregnant women reported uncertainties around heavy-metal exposure from fish varieties, difficulties with the taste or smell of fish, and the symptoms of heartburn and morning sickness reducing the likelihood of increasing fish intake (57) .…”

Iodine Deficiency and Iodine Prophylaxis: An Overview and Update

“…Fresh and farmed fish, as compared to seawater foods, contain less iodine. Thus, fish from rivers or lakes usually have a lower content of this element [ 17 , 18 ].…”