2013
DOI: 10.5516/net.03.2012.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Iodine Removal Efficiency in Non-Submerged and Submerged Self-Priming Venturi Scrubber

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4,[13][14][15][16][17][18] The reason for selecting silver-containing materials over traditional liquid scrubbing methods is concluded to be stronger Ag-I bond and solid form, therefore, higher removal efficiency and lower operation cost. 4,[19][20][21][22] Among these silver-containing materials, Ag 0 Z and Ag 0 -Aerogel have been studied continuously in US national laboratories and universities for their high iodine removal efficiency and relatively greater resistance to aging caused by potential contaminants in VOG and DOG (NO x , water vapor, air). 12,17, 23 Nan et.al 16,19 have conducted the single layer adsorption experiments of I 2 on Ag 0 Z and reported approximately 12 wt% I 2 adsorption capacity at 423K.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,[13][14][15][16][17][18] The reason for selecting silver-containing materials over traditional liquid scrubbing methods is concluded to be stronger Ag-I bond and solid form, therefore, higher removal efficiency and lower operation cost. 4,[19][20][21][22] Among these silver-containing materials, Ag 0 Z and Ag 0 -Aerogel have been studied continuously in US national laboratories and universities for their high iodine removal efficiency and relatively greater resistance to aging caused by potential contaminants in VOG and DOG (NO x , water vapor, air). 12,17, 23 Nan et.al 16,19 have conducted the single layer adsorption experiments of I 2 on Ag 0 Z and reported approximately 12 wt% I 2 adsorption capacity at 423K.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ali et al tested a self-priming venturi scrubber for the I 2 removal efficiency under submerged and nonsubmerged conditions. The submerged conditions indicated the highest efficiency of 99.9 ± 0.1%, which was higher than the nonsubmerged conditions . Later on, Gulhane et al studied the I 2 removal efficiency in a self-priming venturi scrubber under submerged conditions using different pH solutions as a scrubbing liquid .…”
Section: Removal Of Radioactive Iodinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The submerged conditions indicated the highest efficiency of 99.9 ± 0.1%, which was higher than the nonsubmerged conditions. 101 Later on, Gulhane et al studied the I 2 removal efficiency in a self-priming venturi scrubber under submerged conditions using different pH solutions as a scrubbing liquid. 102 The maximum iodine removal efficiency of 66.62% was achieved in solutions at pH 10.…”
Section: Column-based Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple silver containing materials, including macroreticular resins, silver impregnated alumina, silver exchanged faujasite, hydrogen‐reduced silver exchanged mordenite (Ag 0 Z), and reduced silver‐functionalized silica aerogel (Ag 0 ‐Aerogel), have been developed and studied for I 2 and organic iodides adsorption 4,10,14‐18 . The reason for selecting silver‐containing materials over traditional liquid scrubbing methods is concluded to be stronger AgI bond and solid form, therefore, higher removal efficiency and lower operation cost 4,19‐22 . Among these silver‐containing materials, Ag 0 Z and Ag 0 ‐Aerogel have been studied continuously in US national laboratories and universities for their high iodine removal efficiency and relatively greater resistance to aging caused by potential contaminants in VOG and DOG (NO x , water vapor, air) 14,17,23 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,10,[14][15][16][17][18] The reason for selecting silver-containing materials over traditional liquid scrubbing methods is concluded to be stronger Ag I bond and solid form, therefore, higher removal efficiency and lower operation cost. 4,[19][20][21][22] Among these silver-containing materials, Ag 0 Z and Ag 0 -Aerogel have been studied continuously in US national laboratories and universities for their high iodine removal efficiency and relatively greater resistance to aging caused by potential contaminants in VOG and DOG (NO x , water vapor, air). 14,17,23 Nan et al 16,19 have conducted the single-layer adsorption experiments of I 2 on Ag 0 Z and reported approximately 12 wt% Uptake mass Absorbent mass À Á I 2 adsorption capacity at 423 K.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%