Most of what we know of nuclear cardiology has been discovered in the last nearly 50 y. In tracing the history of nuclear cardiology research, we find that, early on, it attracted the attention of some of the best minds in nuclear medicine and cardiology, who were working closely with highly talented, skilled, and academically engaged radiochemists, physicists, and technologists. This successful blueprint of an integrated approach to scientific discovery that addresses clinically relevant issues remains true today and should remain true in the future.Nuclear imaging expands the traditional imaging of anatomic structures to physiologic and biochemical structures or biologic processes. A key attribute of nuclear molecular imaging is that it allows clinicians to visualize cellular functions that influence progression of disease, therapeutic responsiveness, and ultimately patient outcome. Such molecularly targeted imaging has the potential to direct new drug development and new gene-and cellbased therapies and to determine the subset of patients who are most likely to respond to such therapies. Since the introduction of myocardial perfusion (1) and metabolic agents (2), there has been explosive growth in the literature on, and National Institutes of Health funding of, experimental studies on cardiovascular molecular imaging. Unfortunately, such advances in the basic sciences have not translated into clinically approved diagnostic or therapeutic agents. Important challenges that have limited the progression to clinical reality include cost, scalability, and regulatory burden (3).
HOW TO INCREASE THE RELEVANCE OF RESEARCHFor a productive pursuit of scientific investigation, it is essential that a lead or idea be clinically relevant and that it address an unmet need. Next, there must be methodologic and imaging procedures capable of visually or quantitatively capturing the specific biologic process of interest, such as metabolic pathway, receptor biology, or enzyme regulation. For example, the ability to image the metabolic shift of energy production from fatty acids to glucose in the setting of reduced myocardial blood flow at rest has helped explain the pathophysiology of viable, hibernating myocardium and critical patient management decisions regarding coronary artery revascularization, left ventricular assist device placement, cardiac transplantation, or continued medical therapy (4,5).In medicine, we must try to infer the nature of the biologic system from measured dynamic function and to derive information about their causes and interrelations in order to understand normal and abnormal disease conditions. Dynamic and quantitative analysis is a key virtue of nuclear radiotracer-based imaging. It allows assessment of changes in enzymatic or receptor activity as a function of disease severity and time. Creation of the time profile of the change in disease process is critical in following progression or regression of disease and the therapeutic effect of medications over a long period, such as days, weeks, or months....