1978
DOI: 10.2514/3.7538
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ion beam divergence characteristics of two-grid accelerator systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…29 The systematic errors come from several places. The angle of the ion beam source to the magnetic field could deviate 1°or 2°f rom the expected 15°.…”
Section: -7mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29 The systematic errors come from several places. The angle of the ion beam source to the magnetic field could deviate 1°or 2°f rom the expected 15°.…”
Section: -7mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This assumption is derived from the variation of the accel grid hole radius having little effect on beam divergence angle. 14) This indicates that the variation of the cross-sectional area of the ion beam is negligible during operation even if the accel grid hole diameter is enlarged by charge exchange ion erosion.…”
Section: Model 221 Assumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lifetime scaling equation (14) indicates that the duration before causing the electron backstreaming strongly depends on the beam current (proportional to i B 5/3-8/3 ). Based on this characteristic, the life of the grid optics is prolonged by a reduced beam current.…”
Section: Design Guide From Lifetime Scaling Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[2][3][4][5] One of the main issues in the ion beam generation research has been raising the beam flux by optimizing the grid hole diameter, the grid gap, the grid voltage distribution, and the source plasma density. [6][7][8][9][10] Even though a considerable progress has been made in optimizing these physical conditions, a higher ion beam flux is still in demand without a warranty for further improvement. A different approach and the fundamental physics understanding may now be needed for further advances in this field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%