1984
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.52.2217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ion-Dynamics Effect on Hydrogenic Stark Profiles in Hot and Dense Plasmas

Abstract: A computer simulation has been applied to the calculation of Stark profiles of hydrogenic ions for the conditions of inertial confinement fusion. Drastic modifications of the Lymanline profiles are observed when ion dynamics is taken into account.PACS numbers: 32.70.Jz, 32.30.Rj, 32.60.+i In most of the early Stark broadening theories, it was assumed that the plasma ions could be treated as stationary during the radiative lifetime of an excited atom or ion in the plasma. However, in recent years it has been… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, τ e and τ i denote the electron and ion collision times, estimated as r 0 /v e , r 0 /v i with v e , v i being the electron and ion thermal velocities, respec-tively, and r 0 = N −1/3 being the characteristic scale for the mean interparticle distance. Ion dynamics effects (that arise, for instance, if τ i ∼ τ dd ) have been observed [11] and have been extensively investigated, using numerical simulations [4,[12][13][14][15] or ad hoc models based on the statistical properties of the electric field (such as the model microfield method "MMM" [16,17] or the frequency fluctuation model "FFM" [18][19][20]). Incomplete electron collisions (that are expected when τ e ≪ τ dd is not satisfied) have also been investigated, in particular by using refined models for the collision operator, either based on kinetic theory (such as the "unified theory" [21,22]) or semiempirical procedures (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, τ e and τ i denote the electron and ion collision times, estimated as r 0 /v e , r 0 /v i with v e , v i being the electron and ion thermal velocities, respec-tively, and r 0 = N −1/3 being the characteristic scale for the mean interparticle distance. Ion dynamics effects (that arise, for instance, if τ i ∼ τ dd ) have been observed [11] and have been extensively investigated, using numerical simulations [4,[12][13][14][15] or ad hoc models based on the statistical properties of the electric field (such as the model microfield method "MMM" [16,17] or the frequency fluctuation model "FFM" [18][19][20]). Incomplete electron collisions (that are expected when τ e ≪ τ dd is not satisfied) have also been investigated, in particular by using refined models for the collision operator, either based on kinetic theory (such as the "unified theory" [21,22]) or semiempirical procedures (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computer simulations have been used as the basis of computer programs for electron density determination from experimental profiles [78] and to obtain large tabulations of Hydrogen [14,79] or Helium Stark profiles [80,81]. CSM enables line profiles for a wide range of plasma densities, temperatures and compositions to be obtained [82], as well as for cases with plasma unbalances or inhomogeneities that can occur in experimental studies. The profiles obtained considering specific experimental conditions allow researchers to undertake plasma diagnostics by direct comparison of the line profiles obtained in the simulations and those experimentally recorded.…”
Section: I(ωe) Is the Broadened Profile Due To The Impact Electrons mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is clear that in this way the ion impact limit is recovered exactly and in as sophisticated a f orm as desired: For example, one may use the perturbative IA [13], the exact semiclassical dipole results [15] (for hydrogenic emitters) or fully non-perturbative results including higher multipole effects [16]. Further, this separation of the ionic field into fast(impact) and slow components improves the performance and/or reliability of every method capable of dealing with the intermediate(ion dynamical) regime, which will now only have to correctly compute the contribution of the slow part: For simulations [17], it is very expensive to have to integrate over sharp peaks. Such peaks are due to fast perturbers, which are correctly included in the impact part and do not appear in a simulation of the slow part.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%