2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2009.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ion–ion interactions of LiPF6 and LiBF4 in propylene carbonate solutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

27
114
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
27
114
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The NernstEinstein equation is a commonly used tool to determine the level of ionic association (sometimes expressed as the ionic dissociation) for liquid electrolytes [45,60,61]. Figure 11 shows the predicted conductivity was significantly higher than the corresponding measured conductivity.…”
Section: Ionic Associationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The NernstEinstein equation is a commonly used tool to determine the level of ionic association (sometimes expressed as the ionic dissociation) for liquid electrolytes [45,60,61]. Figure 11 shows the predicted conductivity was significantly higher than the corresponding measured conductivity.…”
Section: Ionic Associationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Takeuchi et al measured the self-diffusivities of LiPF 6 in PC by the pulse gradient spin echo (PGSE) NMR technique in the concentration range of 0.1 M to 3 M at room temperature (T = 298 K). 23 Figure 1 shows the self-diffusivities of cation (D + ), anion (D − ), and solvent (D 0 ), respectively. The self-diffusivities decrease as its concentration increases because the ion-ion interaction becomes stronger at higher concentrations.…”
Section: Experimental Values and Evaluation Of Transport Properties Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9. The experimental data in the graph is derived from a nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) technique to measure diffusion: 51 Tsunekawa et al 52 employed NMR to measure the diffusion of Li + and BF Comparison of the estimated Li + diffusivity in pure PC from Takeuchi et al, 11 Tsunekawa et al, 52 Postupna et al, 12 Soetens et al, 21 and the present work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%