2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2011.05.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ion transport membrane reactors for oxy-combustion–Part II: Analysis and comparison of alternatives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
54
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is observed that inclusion of reaction in the sweep (permeate) side of the ITM leads to an increase in the flux of oxygen across the membrane. These observed results are in line with the outcomes obtained by other researchers during their investigation on reactive ITMs [27,39,40]. Increase in the oxygen flux is attributed to the consumption of oxygen in the reaction that leads to a reduction of the partial pressures of oxygen in the sweep side of the membrane, shown in Figure 8.…”
Section: Reactive Casessupporting
confidence: 91%
“…It is observed that inclusion of reaction in the sweep (permeate) side of the ITM leads to an increase in the flux of oxygen across the membrane. These observed results are in line with the outcomes obtained by other researchers during their investigation on reactive ITMs [27,39,40]. Increase in the oxygen flux is attributed to the consumption of oxygen in the reaction that leads to a reduction of the partial pressures of oxygen in the sweep side of the membrane, shown in Figure 8.…”
Section: Reactive Casessupporting
confidence: 91%
“…As the percentage of CH 4 in the sweep gas changes from 100% to 10%, the counter-current regime results in permeation rates that are 6.62-12.75% higher than those of the co-current regime. Manccini and Mitsos [39,40] have developed a block box model for modeling an ITM reactor and obtained similar results, which showed that the counter-current regime is more viable than the co-current.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…For chemical reaction modelling, the generalized single finite‐rate chemical kinetics model used is described as . RCH4=0.25emkCH4nCH4O2nCO2 …”
Section: Mathematical Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%