1980
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3697(80)90010-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ionic conductivity of potassium chloride

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…l), in marked contrast to KC1 (8,9,32). Finally, if we calculate from our parameters the Arrhenius energy expected for single av diffusion, we find ih, + Ah,, = 1.95 eV, in good agreement with the singlevacancy value of 1.92 eV derived by Barr, Morrison, and Schroeder (24).…”
Section: Vacancy Migration Parameterssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…l), in marked contrast to KC1 (8,9,32). Finally, if we calculate from our parameters the Arrhenius energy expected for single av diffusion, we find ih, + Ah,, = 1.95 eV, in good agreement with the singlevacancy value of 1.92 eV derived by Barr, Morrison, and Schroeder (24).…”
Section: Vacancy Migration Parameterssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…KCl, ref. 8) so that we conclude that in NaCl:S2-av and s2-ions are strongly associated, as was also true for ~0~~-ions in KC1 (8,9). Figure 5 shows the conductivity plots for pure NaCl and ~a C 1 : s~-containing 60 ppm of the divalent impurity.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The conductivity vs 10 3 /T plots of pure KCl and gadolinium doped KCl crystals are shown in figure 1. The conductivity mechanism of pure crystals was discussed earlier by various investigators (Nadler and Rossel 1973;Buniya 1977;Acuna and Jacobs 1980;Saibabu 1995).…”
Section: Effect Of Impurity Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 88%