2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2015.04.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ionic liquid-functionalized crystals of barium sulfate: A hybrid organic–inorganic material with tuned hydrophilicity and solid–liquid behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a scenario is supported by recent findings showing that the driving mechanism for binding of ligands to proteins or self-assembly of folded proteins (creation of intermolecular contacts) is determined by the tendency of unsatisfied hydrogen-bonding sites at the protein surface to dehydrate upon contact formation. , Thus, the driving force encouraging protein partitioning to the solid substrate can result from the stabilization of the protein surface-exposed hydrogen-bonding sites upon hydrogen-bond formation with the inorganic solid. This mechanism of interaction corroborates the observation that the IL ions and myoglobin compete for electron-donating sites at the solid surface, as it has been recognized that ILs also bind to the surface-exposed SO 4 2– . It has been shown that amphiphilic peptides can form on charged hydrophilic surface multiple layers driven by self-association of the hydrophobic side chains in order to minimize their contact with water when the hydrophilic compartments interact with the solid .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Such a scenario is supported by recent findings showing that the driving mechanism for binding of ligands to proteins or self-assembly of folded proteins (creation of intermolecular contacts) is determined by the tendency of unsatisfied hydrogen-bonding sites at the protein surface to dehydrate upon contact formation. , Thus, the driving force encouraging protein partitioning to the solid substrate can result from the stabilization of the protein surface-exposed hydrogen-bonding sites upon hydrogen-bond formation with the inorganic solid. This mechanism of interaction corroborates the observation that the IL ions and myoglobin compete for electron-donating sites at the solid surface, as it has been recognized that ILs also bind to the surface-exposed SO 4 2– . It has been shown that amphiphilic peptides can form on charged hydrophilic surface multiple layers driven by self-association of the hydrophobic side chains in order to minimize their contact with water when the hydrophilic compartments interact with the solid .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…BaSO 4 crystals were synthesized and functionalized following the procedure described in detail in our previous publication . In summary, micrometer-sized BaSO 4 (barite) crystals were precipitated by mixing aqueous solutions of BaCl 2 and Na 2 SO 4 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such considerations are in agreement with previous studies showing that mainly charged arginine provides binding sites on protein adsorption to silica nanoparticles [57] with character of those specific contacts being possibly determinative for protein functionality [58]. Yet, for patchy molecules with polar and non-polar regions it is their hydration state that defines net surface coverage developed on the solid [59]. Thus large protein-particle assemblies can be formed in solution due to dipole-like many-body interactions within this network, while packing density of individual protein coronas can be limited by shortrange hydration repulsion between immobilized proteins [15].…”
Section: Proteinsurface Interactionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Most of the polymers are hydrophobic and incompatible with the hydrophilic nanofillers. The issue of nanofiller agglomeration and weak particle-polymer affinity often lead to detrimental effects on the mechanical strength 29 31 . The interactions between the polymer and filler at the interface significantly influence the composite’s mechanical properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%