2016
DOI: 10.1039/c6ra07017e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ionic liquid prolongs DNA translocation through graphene nanopores

Abstract: Ionic liquid molecules interact strongly with DNA and effectively reduce its translocation speed via graphene nanopore.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A cell contains only two copies of each DNA molecule, and its preservation during the sequencing procedure is of utmost importance ( 109–112 ). [C 4 Mim][Cl] decelerates dsDNA translocation through a graphene nanopore which can be advantageous in genome sequencing techniques ( 113 ).…”
Section: Nucleic Acids In Ionic Liquidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A cell contains only two copies of each DNA molecule, and its preservation during the sequencing procedure is of utmost importance ( 109–112 ). [C 4 Mim][Cl] decelerates dsDNA translocation through a graphene nanopore which can be advantageous in genome sequencing techniques ( 113 ).…”
Section: Nucleic Acids In Ionic Liquidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the latter case, novel magnetic ILs turn out to be particularly interesting for the purpose of effective extraction and preservation of DNA (Clark et al 2015a(Clark et al , b, 2016. For industrial purposes, ILs are being currently applied in DNA-based biosensors (Chen et al 2013;Sun et al 2013;Machado et al 2014), or to assist a vast variety of methods in genetic manipulations, including genomic sequencing (Kulkarni and Mukherjee 2016), cloning (Li et al 2013b), or gene delivery and transformation (Zhang et al 2009;Soni et al 2015). Moreover, replacement of standard aqueous solutions by ILs as solvents and catalysts for laboratory purposes enabled to overcome certain technological limitations associated with DNA nanotechnology (Nishimura et al 2005;Dandia et al 2013) due to enhanced DNA stability and solubility in ILs (Zhang et al 2009;Sharma et al 2015;Jumbri et al 2016;Mishra et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3D, there was a brief surge of ionic current (∼1.3× of baseline value) at the entrance of 10‐nt ssDNA, followed by multiple resistive pulses from the nucleobase translocations and another current surge flagging the exit of the molecule. The abrupt current surges at the molecular entrance and exit could be due to the brief ionic crowding effect near the translocating strand [60]. The current surges by the exiting and entering molecules occurred almost concurrently in ∼30 μs range (inter‐molecular duration) due to the continuous back‐to‐back molecular translocations (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%