“…The transformation of sulfides to the corresponding sulfoxides is a significant issue for economic and environmental considerations, not only because such processes can synthesize intermediates with pharmaceutical and chemical activity but also because the transformation can purify toxic chemicals, such as oxidative detoxification of the sulfur mustard simulant and oxidative desulfurization of petroleum . Although many traditional stoichiometric oxidants (e.g., nitric acid, hypervalent iodine, oxone, K 2 FeO 4 , and so forth) have been proved to be effective for the oxidation of sulfide, most systems usually suffer from numerous defects in terms of low sulfoxide selectivity, extreme reaction conditions, complex handling procedures, as well as generating environmentally harmful toxic pollutants. − As an alternative solution, therefore, a wide variety of catalytic oxidation systems using metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), ionic liquid, covalent–organic frameworks (COFs), or modified zeolites as catalysts, and molecular oxygen, hydrogen peroxide, or tert -butyl hydroperoxide as environmentally benign oxidants have gradually attracted extensive attention from researchers. − Nevertheless, it is frustrating that some above systems remain displaying low sulfoxide yield and lack versatility and economic applicability. Hereto, the search for highly active and selective catalysts for the oxidation of sulfides is a challenging subject.…”