1985
DOI: 10.1080/00103628509367659
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ionic strength effect on heavy metal adsorption by soil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0
11

Year Published

1989
1989
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
23
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Choudhury and Khanif (2000) observed that Cu adsorption was not statistically different in three alluvial soils from Malaysia when concentrations varied from 200 to 500 µg g -1 of metal. At concentrations between 1 to 10 mg kg -1 , Cu had a high affinity for the adsorption surfaces and could be completely adsorbed (Petruzzelli et al,1985). Similar results were obtained by Jordão et al (2000), who demonstrated the occurrence of two phases in the adsorption curve.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Choudhury and Khanif (2000) observed that Cu adsorption was not statistically different in three alluvial soils from Malaysia when concentrations varied from 200 to 500 µg g -1 of metal. At concentrations between 1 to 10 mg kg -1 , Cu had a high affinity for the adsorption surfaces and could be completely adsorbed (Petruzzelli et al,1985). Similar results were obtained by Jordão et al (2000), who demonstrated the occurrence of two phases in the adsorption curve.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…With the increase in the metal concentration, more sites were filled and Cu retention became more difficult (Petruzzelli et al, 1985). At the lower concentrations of added Cu (up to 20 mg kg -1 ), all Cu was adsorbed by the three soils.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although Zn was not a strong competitor with Cd for binding sites in soils, increasing soil solution concentrations of Zn, H, or Ca increased Cd desorption and soil solution concentration of Cd (Christensen 1984b). Increases in ionic strength also increased the concentration of Cd in the soil solution (Petruzzelli et al 1985;Lorenz et al 1994). Garcia-Miragaya and Page (1976) suggested that the decrease in Cd sorption with increasing ionic strength of an electrolyte was due to: (i) competition of Cd 2+ with the electrolyte cations for available clay surface sites; (ii) decreased activity of the Cd 2+ in solution and; (iii) formation of uncharged ion pairs and/or uncharged and negatively charged complexes of Cd with the anions in the electrolyte.…”
Section: Soil Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The smaller steepness of the isotherms of these soils implies that most of the metals were adsorbed even at the smaller concentrations, decreasing as the metal concentration increased. For all soils, the amount of adsorbed Cd, Cu, Ni and Zn increased as the concentration of the metals increased, although the rate of the increase became smaller as lesser adsorption sites were available (Petruzzelli et al 1985;Ross 1994). Almost the whole amount of metals added were adsorbed in soils Oll, Ult2, Alf1 and Ox5, as can be seen by the steep isotherms of the group L1 (Figure 1).…”
Section: Adsorption Isotherms For CD Cu Ni and Znmentioning
confidence: 99%