2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2006.03.117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ionic strength effects on the association funnel of barnase and barstar investigated by Brownian dynamics simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analysis of the effect of the mutations on the encounter complex showed that a single mutation could considerably alter the freeenergy landscape and change the population of the two minima (i.e., the two regions of the encounter complex). As expected for a charged protein-pair like barnase-barstar, the free-energy landscape was also affected by ionic strength (33).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Analysis of the effect of the mutations on the encounter complex showed that a single mutation could considerably alter the freeenergy landscape and change the population of the two minima (i.e., the two regions of the encounter complex). As expected for a charged protein-pair like barnase-barstar, the free-energy landscape was also affected by ionic strength (33).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…8,10,11 Superimposing the Brownian dynamics analysis with the here generated transition state map shows that the "hot region" of the transition state superimposed well with the encounter complex region located above the interface, but not with the region mapped near the RNA binding site (Figure 8). According to Spaar et al, the two encounter complex regions differ in their energetics; the region above the interface is more favorable than the region above the RNA binding site, which seems to be not essential for the association.…”
Section: Mapping the Barnase-barstar Transition Statementioning
confidence: 90%
“…The pathways for association and dissociation of these two molecules were described as well. [7][8][9][10][11] Recently, Alsallaq and Zhou provided an alternative theoretical method for studying transient association complexes. Using a toy model of Barnase-Barstar, they showed that the transition state is close in space to the final complex, albeit with more degrees of freedom and only a few specific interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transient-complex ensemble separates the bound and unbound states of molecules. Although in case of protein–protein association the reaction criteria are typically straightforward, based on crystallographic structures of complexes and tuned versus experimental data, 48 , 53 , 93–95 it is not easy to define the reaction-criteria in the ribosome system. A major difficulty is that the ribosome is highly flexible 20 , 84 and characterizing the dynamical states of the ribosome with and without EF-G is, despite a lot of effort, 42 , 61 , 96–98 still to be completed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%