2010
DOI: 10.1149/1.3432559
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ionic vs Electronic Power Limitations and Analysis of the Fraction of Wired Grains in LiFePO[sub 4] Composite Electrodes

Abstract: This study, realized within the framework of the optimization of aqueous LiFePO4 composite electrodes, relies on Prosini’s approach [ J. Electrochem. Soc. 152 , A1925 (2005) ] that characterizes the LiFePO4/Li discharge behavior through simple equations. Two key parameters extracted from the LiFePO4 discharge curves are analyzed to determine the optimal electrode engineering and to interpret the origins of the electrode performance limitations. In particular, the calendaring step plays a critical role.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
147
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(158 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
9
147
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Electrode porosity is a crucial electrode parameter as it strongly influences battery performance (Fongy et al, 2010a,b;Strobridge et al, 2015;Just, 2016;Liu et al, 2017). Generally, a larger porosity favors Li-ion transport allowing larger (dis)charge (Singh et al, 2013b;Just, 2016) at the expense of the volumetric density Singh et al, 2016) and electrical conductivity of the electrode (Wang and Hong, 2007;Fongy et al, 2010a). The optimum seems to be reached by a certain porosity gradient (Du et al, 2017;Liu et al, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electrode porosity is a crucial electrode parameter as it strongly influences battery performance (Fongy et al, 2010a,b;Strobridge et al, 2015;Just, 2016;Liu et al, 2017). Generally, a larger porosity favors Li-ion transport allowing larger (dis)charge (Singh et al, 2013b;Just, 2016) at the expense of the volumetric density Singh et al, 2016) and electrical conductivity of the electrode (Wang and Hong, 2007;Fongy et al, 2010a). The optimum seems to be reached by a certain porosity gradient (Du et al, 2017;Liu et al, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of the LFP cathode, several studies report the influence of properties like optimal electrode thickness, [45][46][47] active material and inactive material weight fractions, [46][47][48][49] and porosity 48,50 on the performance of the full cell. Fongy et al, 50 use a parameter which defines the rate of loss in capacity with increase in discharge current to find a critical porosity window between 30% and 40%.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fongy et al, 50 use a parameter which defines the rate of loss in capacity with increase in discharge current to find a critical porosity window between 30% and 40%. They conclude that a porosity of 30% or below would be highly detrimental to the performance due to restricted diffusion of Li-ions in the pores and above 40% the performance would be affected by reduced electronic conductivity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, optimization studies have also been conducted to determine the optimal ranges for the LiFePO 4 battery design parameters, including the particle size, the electrode thickness, the porosity (density), and the conductor ratio (conductor weight fraction). [9][10][11][12] The optimization of the battery design parameters based solely on experimental approaches is difficult, not to mention time-consuming. 13 To facilitate the optimization, numerical modeling can help to accelerate the process by elucidating the effects of the electrode design parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%