“…Spectroscopy and X-ray crystallography data, reported for some salts of protonated solvents with O atom donors, generally support the notion of disolvation of the proton–i.e., [ether-H (+) -ether][anion] is a valid molecular representation in general. ,,− For the observed product of a reaction of H 2 with ether solutions of BCF or its analogs, the notion of two ether molecules coordinated to the proton is consistent with reported observations. ,, In part, persistent interest in knowing more about the manner of hydrogen bonding in an oxonium cation and specifics of the cation–anion interaction stems from notable effects in vibrational (IR) spectra. , The vibrational OHO-contribution can shift from its typical position at ca. 3000 cm –1 for normal hydrogen bonding (O–H···O) to as low as 1000 cm –1 for SSLB hydrogen bonding (O–H–O) , e.g., the IR spectra of salts including oxonium cations. − , Better understanding of SSLB-type O–H (+) –O bonding, which is quite different from typical N–H···O or O–H···O bonding with asymmetric distances between the proton and hetero atoms, is highly desirable, especially with account of molecular motion of cation perturbed by docking to a structurally complex anion. Differently from previously known salts composed of an oxonium cation and borate anion, e.g., Jutzi’s acid [(Et 2 O) 2 H (+) ][(C 6 F 5 ) 4 B (−) ] or other salts with borate anions [(EWG) 4 B (−) ] having four substituents on boron, an anion of the type [(EWG) 3 B–H (−) ] has only three boron-bound groups and a certain direction defined by B → H “vector” that is perpendicular to the “equatorial” plane encompassing the trio of the boron-bound C atoms.…”