2014
DOI: 10.1021/jp508985s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ionization Energies of Three Resonance-Stabilized Radicals: Cyclohexadienyl (dn, n = 0, 1, 6, 7), 1-Phenylpropargyl, and Methylcyclohexadienyl

Abstract: The ionization energies for three resonance-stabilized radicals are determined: cyclohexadienyl, 1-phenylpropargyl, and methylcyclohexadienyl. The recommended ionization energies are, respectively, 6.820(1), 6.585(1), and 7.232(1) eV. That of cyclohexadienyl is found to be just 0.02 eV above a high level ab initio calculation [Bargholz, A.; Oswald, R.; Botschwina, P. J. Chem. Phys. 2013, 138, 014307], and that of 1-phenylpropargyl is found within the stated error of a recent experimental determination [Holzmei… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
30
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
4
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All four isomers are predicted to have similar ionization energies and, characteristic of the B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p) level of theory, the values are lower than the observed value. [33,35] For a range of resonance-stabilized radicals, Troy reported that the B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p) adiabatic ionization energies underestimated experiment by a deviation of 0.14( 7 The reported ionization energy in the text and Table 1 is corrected by +0.007 eV to account for the finite electric field in the extraction region of the spectrometer. [33] adding the 0.14 (7) eV to the calculated adiabatic energies, we obtain our best calculated estimates for the ionization energies of the various isomers.…”
Section: Identification Of the 9-dihydroanthracenyl Radicalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All four isomers are predicted to have similar ionization energies and, characteristic of the B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p) level of theory, the values are lower than the observed value. [33,35] For a range of resonance-stabilized radicals, Troy reported that the B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p) adiabatic ionization energies underestimated experiment by a deviation of 0.14( 7 The reported ionization energy in the text and Table 1 is corrected by +0.007 eV to account for the finite electric field in the extraction region of the spectrometer. [33] adding the 0.14 (7) eV to the calculated adiabatic energies, we obtain our best calculated estimates for the ionization energies of the various isomers.…”
Section: Identification Of the 9-dihydroanthracenyl Radicalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cyclohexadienyl radical itself (H + benzene) is well characterized. [10][11][12][13] Additionally, several reports characterizing the hydronaphthyl radical (H + naphthalene) have been reported recently. [14][15][16][17][18] However, the spectroscopy, structure, energetics and kinetics of H-addition to other common aromatics, such as toluene and phenol, are largely unreported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the peculiar features of cycloheptatriene, we envisaged that a detailed gas phase reactivity study towards [Fe IV (O)(TPFPP + · )] + would be interesting, and help elucidate intrinsic factors that determine the reactivity behavior of this model of P450 Cpd I. An interesting comparison may also arise from the reaction of [Fe IV (O)(TPFPP + · )] + with 1,3‐cyclohexadiene (CHD) as it has a comparable IE and also similar C–H BDE CH for the methylene group (IE and BDE CH values are equal to 8.25 eV and 72.9 kcal mol –1 , respectively), see Table , , . However, ionization of the so‐formed radical is remarkably easier for c‐C 7 H 7 · when compared to the c‐C 6 H 7 · radical from 1,3‐cyclohexadiene (6.28 vs. 6.82 eV, respectively).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, ionization of the so‐formed radical is remarkably easier for c‐C 7 H 7 · when compared to the c‐C 6 H 7 · radical from 1,3‐cyclohexadiene (6.28 vs. 6.82 eV, respectively). Table gives a summary of all cited thermochemical data , , …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%