1991
DOI: 10.1016/0168-9002(91)90250-t
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ionization energy loss in very thin absorbers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No reference to atomic binding energies can be retrieved in GEANT 3 documentation; however, according to comments embedded in the code, GEANT 3 used Bearden and Burr's binding energies, with updated values for xenon derived from [46]. Nevertheless, the GSHLIN subroutine, where binding energies are hard-coded, exhibits some discrepancies with respect to both Bearden and Burr's tabulations and the values in [46]; the origin of these values could not be retrieved in the literature, nor in the software documentation. Presumably, the code implementation and its comments went out of phase at some stage of GEANT 3 evolution.…”
Section: Binding Energies Used By Physics Software Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No reference to atomic binding energies can be retrieved in GEANT 3 documentation; however, according to comments embedded in the code, GEANT 3 used Bearden and Burr's binding energies, with updated values for xenon derived from [46]. Nevertheless, the GSHLIN subroutine, where binding energies are hard-coded, exhibits some discrepancies with respect to both Bearden and Burr's tabulations and the values in [46]; the origin of these values could not be retrieved in the literature, nor in the software documentation. Presumably, the code implementation and its comments went out of phase at some stage of GEANT 3 evolution.…”
Section: Binding Energies Used By Physics Software Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A model for the calculation of ionization losses of relativistic particles in thin absorbers, with comparison to experimental results, is given in Grishin et al (1991).…”
Section: Energy Loss Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%