2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2009.07.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ionizing radiation-induced bystander effects, potential targets for modulation of radiotherapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
63
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
2
63
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These data indicate that decay of p-H2AX foci in WT BM-EPCs ex vivo is slow within the first 24 h, which may be indicative of delayed or inefficient radiation-induced DNA damage repair. In addition, significant increase in mean foci/cell on day 7 post-IR along with an increase in the percentage of p-H2AX foci/cell may be indicative of significant radiobiological bystander responses in BM-EPCs (3,4,6,7,65).…”
Section: Tnfr2/p75 Regulate Ir-induced Nontargeted Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data indicate that decay of p-H2AX foci in WT BM-EPCs ex vivo is slow within the first 24 h, which may be indicative of delayed or inefficient radiation-induced DNA damage repair. In addition, significant increase in mean foci/cell on day 7 post-IR along with an increase in the percentage of p-H2AX foci/cell may be indicative of significant radiobiological bystander responses in BM-EPCs (3,4,6,7,65).…”
Section: Tnfr2/p75 Regulate Ir-induced Nontargeted Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These biological effects are attributed to unrepaired or misrepaired DNA damage in cells directly hit by radiation. However, the effects of ionizing radiation also extend to cells that were not themselves irradiated, but were neighbors or the progeny of irradiated cells [Huang et al, 2007;Sowa, 2007, 2009;Kovalchuk and Baulch, 2008;Rzeszowska-Wolny et al, 2009;Wright, 2010]. The molecular mechanisms of these non-targeted effects are a matter of intensive investigation and are not fully understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, IR has 'bystander effects' induced by signals from irradiated cells, which decreases clonogenic survival, induces genetic instability by elevated sister chromatid exchanges and promotes apoptosis as well as significant alterations in gene expression (4) . Exposure to IR leads to cell death or apoptosis through DNA damage by inducing DNA single-strand breaks (SSBs) and double-strand breaks (DSBs) (4 -6) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%