2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-00761-4_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IoT Architectural Styles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, six computational components can be identified. These are Identification, Sensing, Communication, Computation, Services and Semantics [2], [7]. Within smart home scenarios, a four-layered architecture can be regarded as a common model for structuring these components.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Overall, six computational components can be identified. These are Identification, Sensing, Communication, Computation, Services and Semantics [2], [7]. Within smart home scenarios, a four-layered architecture can be regarded as a common model for structuring these components.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, relevant IoT architectures can be conceptually described as a four-layered architecture integrating a 1) sensing layer containing sensors and RFID tags 2) a networking layer providing basic transfer networks 3) a service layer to control system states according to user goals and 4) a platform interface layer accessed by the user and other systems. In most cases, such architectural styles are centralized platforms that connect distributed devices [7]. Furthermore, the most studied quality attributes of IoT architectures are scalability, security, interoperability and performance [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our previous work [5], we classified IoT distribution patterns as: centralized, collaborative, , that is a model objected on imposing automatic control on dynamic behavior of a system and has been used in various fields such as software engineering. However, we realized that most of adaptation patterns are unmatched with IoT distribution patterns, so that making a combination of them can be infeasible or weak.…”
Section: Self-adaptive Iot Architectures For Emergency Handlingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The novelty of this method lies within the incremental formalization of semantic integration knowledge for IoT devices in addition to programming iterative software adapters. Over time, shared semantic integration knowledge can be utilized as a basis to generate adapters for the underlying IoT architecture [11]. Solution: In this paper, we will introduce a domain-specific mapping language and tool support that can be used to express mappings and communication patterns for Vorto device descriptions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%