2021
DOI: 10.3390/s21062239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IoT Data Qualification for a Logistic Chain Traceability Smart Contract

Abstract: In the logistic chain domain, the traceability of shipments in their entire delivery process from the shipper to the consignee involves many stakeholders. From the traceability data, contractual decisions may be taken such as incident detection, validation of the delivery or billing. The stakeholders require transparency in the whole process. The combination of the Internet of Things (IoT) and the blockchain paradigms helps in the development of automated and trusted systems. In this context, ensuring the qual… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5) Malicious attacks on traceability devices might be feasible. 6) Possible issues in data integrity, tampering, and single points of failure 7) Data integrity is possible inaccurate 8) IoT data event incoherence sent from several IOT data sources (Duan et al, 2020;Mirabelli & Solina, 2020;Ahmed et al, 2021) 6 Technol ogy Artificia l Intellig ence 1) A.I. integration may influence the human workforce 2) Breach of data privacy 3) Some stakeholders are unable to cope with technology (Baryannis et al, 2019;Di Vaio et al, 2020;Riahi et al, 2021) 7 Technol ogy Blockch ain 1) Quality perceptions and purchasing decisions depend on complete traceability devices 2) An inadequate grasp of technological challenges and raw data manipulation 3) Difficulties in enlisting the support by stakeholders, as well as lack of rules 4) Due to the huge number of users and transactions in one FSC.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5) Malicious attacks on traceability devices might be feasible. 6) Possible issues in data integrity, tampering, and single points of failure 7) Data integrity is possible inaccurate 8) IoT data event incoherence sent from several IOT data sources (Duan et al, 2020;Mirabelli & Solina, 2020;Ahmed et al, 2021) 6 Technol ogy Artificia l Intellig ence 1) A.I. integration may influence the human workforce 2) Breach of data privacy 3) Some stakeholders are unable to cope with technology (Baryannis et al, 2019;Di Vaio et al, 2020;Riahi et al, 2021) 7 Technol ogy Blockch ain 1) Quality perceptions and purchasing decisions depend on complete traceability devices 2) An inadequate grasp of technological challenges and raw data manipulation 3) Difficulties in enlisting the support by stakeholders, as well as lack of rules 4) Due to the huge number of users and transactions in one FSC.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For maximum transparency and traceability, the proposed system permanently stores and records all activities, events, and transactions on the blockchain, which is linked to peer-to-peer decentralised file systems like IPFS, Swarm, Filecoin, and others [86]. Finally, to improve the quality of IoT-related data in the context of logistics traceability, the authors in [87] propose a distributed architecture. They apply their approach in a medical equipment use case scenario related to perishable medical diagnostic kits.…”
Section: Classification Of the Retrieved Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because there is currently no standardization for IoT devices. This lack of standardization makes it difficult for different devices to communicate with each other, which limits the potential of IoT (Ahmed et al, 2021).…”
Section: Internet Of Things and Supply Chain Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%