2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-36599-8_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IoT Data Validation Using Spatial and Temporal Correlations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Future works are devoted to implement such solutions: in particular, the spatial-temporal algorithm presented in [ 9 ] will be exploited as a starting point.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future works are devoted to implement such solutions: in particular, the spatial-temporal algorithm presented in [ 9 ] will be exploited as a starting point.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, given that, in a wearable environment, WEAR-IT acts as an intermediate data collector, it is important to ensure that the quality of data stored is high enough (see Section 5.2 ). This issue is currently addressing our research [ 48 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…STID FC repairs faulty thematic values [98,178,184] or imprecise timestamps [91,138,157,162,188]. Pumpichet et al [178] employ a belief-based approach to identify a group of helpful neighboring sensors based on the consistency of their data streams, estimating replacement values for dirty readings based on the time and distance over the identified group.…”
Section: Fault Correction (Fc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When these vectors indicate a provisionally unreliable data source, such a source is replaced by an alternate virtual data source that is created based on spatiotemporal analysis and interpolation methods. Providing a centralized data validation method, Sartori et al [184] measure the Pearson correlation coefficients between the most recent reading sequences of adjacent sensors and find repairs for missing and anomalous readings from a single sensor based on the readings from correlated sensors.…”
Section: Fault Correction (Fc)mentioning
confidence: 99%