IoT implementation for energy system sustainability: The role of actors and related challenges

Stephen Ball, Christopher; Degischer, Daniel

doi:10.1016/j.jup.2024.101769

Utilities Policy

2024

DOI: 10.1016/j.jup.2024.101769

|View full text |Cite

IoT implementation for energy system sustainability: The role of actors and related challenges

Christopher Stephen Ball,

Daniel Degischer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2024

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

References 111 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

20 years review of the multi actor multi criteria analysis (MAMCA) framework: a proposition of a systematic guideline

Huang,

Heuninckx,

Macharis

2024

Ann Oper Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Multi-criteria Decision Making (MCDM) involves evaluating alternatives based on a comprehensive set of conflicting criteria, often requiring the involvement of varied decision makers. This has led to the emergence of stakeholder-based multi-criteria group decision-making (MCGDM) frameworks. However, traditional MCGDM frequently overlooks the interactions and trade-offs among different actors and criteria. The Multi-actor Multi-criteria Analysis (MAMCA), developed in 2000, provides a transparent decision-making process explicitly considering these interrelationships. It allows diverse stakeholder groups to represent their priorities, thereby enhancing their understanding of their own and others’ positions. Over the past two decades, MAMCA has seen a significant rise in popularity and has been widely applied in diverse contexts, proving valuable as both a decision-making and stakeholder engagement tool. However, our analysis of publications on cases in which MAMCA was applied over the years shows that considerable variation exists in the overall process approach, contingent upon the specific goals and context. To address these variations, this paper proposes a modularized MAMCA structure, complemented by systematic application guidelines, to aid future users in navigating the process steps and identifying the most suitable methods for each step. Additionally, future research directions are suggested for potential enhancements to the MAMCA framework by integrating varied methodologies.

show abstract

20 years review of the multi actor multi criteria analysis (MAMCA) framework: a proposition of a systematic guideline

Huang,

Heuninckx,

Macharis

2024

Ann Oper Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

IoT implementation for energy system sustainability: The role of actors and related challenges

Cited by 1 publication

References 111 publications

20 years review of the multi actor multi criteria analysis (MAMCA) framework: a proposition of a systematic guideline

20 years review of the multi actor multi criteria analysis (MAMCA) framework: a proposition of a systematic guideline

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About