2017
DOI: 10.1080/09500782.2016.1276585
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

iPads and paintbrushes: integrating digital media into an intergenerational art class

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, contact theory suggests that simply bringing together the young and elderly in interactive contexts can overcome generational stereotyping, an important aim for many intergenerational programs (Gallagher and Fitzpatrick 2018; Giraudeau and Bailly 2019; Hanmore-Cawley and Scharf 2018; Kuehne and Melville 2014;Macfarlane et al 2019;Sun et al 2019;Teater 2016;Yasunaga et al 2016). However, existing research also shows the limitations of simply putting different generations together in an unstructured way, suggesting the most effective way to build relationships and counteract stereotyping in intergenerational practice is through shared purpose, activities, and focus (Heydon et al 2017;Gallagher and Fitzpatrick 2018;Pinazo-Hernandis 2011;Femia et al 2008;Jarrott 2011). Thus, the perceived benefits of intergenerational programs for older adults is when they provide purposeful and structured opportunities to engage with children in enjoyable, socially appropriate activities (Femia et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, contact theory suggests that simply bringing together the young and elderly in interactive contexts can overcome generational stereotyping, an important aim for many intergenerational programs (Gallagher and Fitzpatrick 2018; Giraudeau and Bailly 2019; Hanmore-Cawley and Scharf 2018; Kuehne and Melville 2014;Macfarlane et al 2019;Sun et al 2019;Teater 2016;Yasunaga et al 2016). However, existing research also shows the limitations of simply putting different generations together in an unstructured way, suggesting the most effective way to build relationships and counteract stereotyping in intergenerational practice is through shared purpose, activities, and focus (Heydon et al 2017;Gallagher and Fitzpatrick 2018;Pinazo-Hernandis 2011;Femia et al 2008;Jarrott 2011). Thus, the perceived benefits of intergenerational programs for older adults is when they provide purposeful and structured opportunities to engage with children in enjoyable, socially appropriate activities (Femia et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, intergenerational programs, and the reporting of them vary greatly on what types of activities have most impact. While some discuss the use of singlefocused activities, such as singing, technology, or art, reporting of other programs barely mention the types of activities undertaken (Beynon et al 2013;DeVore and Aeschlimann 2016;Heydon et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paciga and Quest (2017) used ethnographic methods and provided a detailed account of the key role played by a parent in supporting the digital reading experience of her two children. Heydon et al. (2017) used an ethnographic approach with 15 elders and 9 pre-schoolers to examine the ways in which digital books might expand children’s reader identities and promote intergenerational dialogue.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three qualitative studies looked at parents' attitudes towards their children's reading on screen at home and the role of elders and grandparents in shaping children's experiences of digital books. For example,Paciga and Quest (2017) examined with ethnographic methods and provided a detailed account of the key role played by a parent in supporting the digital reading experience of her two children Heydon, McKee and Daly (2017). used an ethnographic approach with fifteen elders and nine pre-schoolers to examine the ways in which digital books might expand children's reader identities and promote intergenerational dialogue.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They can incorporate the intergenerational practices identified here into their current programming, particularly those aligning with their organization’s practice or care philosophy. Some of the practices stem from research and theory specific to youth (e.g., fostering empathy; Heydon et al, 2017 ) or older adults (e.g., providing meaningful occupation; Gruenewald et al, 2016 ). These may be familiar to practitioners accustomed to working with one age group and are often equally effective in the intergenerational setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%