2012
DOI: 10.1007/s13562-012-0175-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

iPBS-Retrotransposons-based genetic diversity and relationship among wild annual Cicer species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
54
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
8
54
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, it was observed that a rapid mutational process in plants caused by TE during environmental stress, could be adventitious for the particular group of organisms, by rapidly increasing genotypic variability, which may be associated with adaptation for abiotic stress (Wessler 1996;Kalendar et al 2000;Finatto et al 2015). The development of iPBS technique allowed for tracking genomic changes induced by TE in species for which genomic information is limited: Prunus arme− niaca (Baránek et al 2012), Malus x domestica (Kuras et al 2013), Cicer species (Andeden et al 2013), Psidium guajava (Mehmood et al 2013), Myrica rubra (Chen and Liu 2014). However, so far, iPBS genotyping has not been applied to the analysis of genetic variability shaped in environmental stress gradient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it was observed that a rapid mutational process in plants caused by TE during environmental stress, could be adventitious for the particular group of organisms, by rapidly increasing genotypic variability, which may be associated with adaptation for abiotic stress (Wessler 1996;Kalendar et al 2000;Finatto et al 2015). The development of iPBS technique allowed for tracking genomic changes induced by TE in species for which genomic information is limited: Prunus arme− niaca (Baránek et al 2012), Malus x domestica (Kuras et al 2013), Cicer species (Andeden et al 2013), Psidium guajava (Mehmood et al 2013), Myrica rubra (Chen and Liu 2014). However, so far, iPBS genotyping has not been applied to the analysis of genetic variability shaped in environmental stress gradient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PCR amplifications were performed in an Eppendorf DNA Thermal Master Gradient Cycler (Eppendorf Netheler Hinz, Hamburg, Germany), and were conducted in a 25-µL reaction mixture containing 25 ng template DNA, 1X Dream Taq Green Buffer (Fermentas), 0.2 mM dNTP (Fermentas), 1 µM primer for 12-to 13-nt primers or 0.6 µM for 18-nt primers, 1.5 U Dream Taq DNA polymerase (Fermentas), and 0.04 U PFU DNA polymerase (Fermentas) (Baloch et al, 2015). The PCR thermal cycling profile was as follows: initial denaturation at 95°C for 3 min, 30 cycles at 95°C for 15 s, 50-65°C annealing temperature (depending upon the primer) for 1 min, 68°C for 1 min, and a final extension at 72°C for 5 min (Andeden et al, 2013). All of the PCR products were separated by 1.7% (w/v) agarose gel electrophoresis with 0.5X TBE buffer for 2 h, stained with ethidium bromide, and visualized using an ultraviolet transilluminator (Infinity ST5, Vilber Lourmat, France).…”
Section: Ipbs-retrotransposon Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inter-primer binding site (iPBS) method has proven to be a powerful DNA fingerprinting technique without the need for previous knowledge of a sequence, and is referred to as a universal marker system because iPBS-retrotransposons comprise the only retrotransposon-based marker system that has allowed polymorphism visualization throughout the plant kingdom. iPBSretrotransposon DNA markers have been successfully employed in evaluating the genetic diversity of Saussurea esthonica, apricot, grapevine, Cicer species, guava, Chinese bayberry (Myrica rubra), and cultivated and wild Lens species (Gailite et al, 2011;Baránek et al, 2012;Guo et al, 2012;Andeden et al, 2013;Mehmood et al, 2013;Fang-Yong and Ji-Hong, 2014;Baloch et al, 2015). However, iPBS-retrotransposon markers have not yet been used in genetic diversity studies of rice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LTR retrotransposons predominate in plant genomes and can be used as molecular markers due to their ubiquitous distribution, abundant copy number, high heterogeneity, and random nature of insertional polymorphisms resulting from different retrotransposon insertion mechanisms (Shen et al, 2011;Guo et al, 2014c). In addition, LTR retrotransposons contain highly conserved regions for primer design in the development of retrotransposon-based markers (Andeden et al, 2013). Another important feature of LTR retrotransposons is their stability over millions of years due to the nature of their insertion (Sanz et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The iPBS marker method has several advantages compared with other retrotransposon markers: iPBSs can discriminate among genotypes without prior sequence knowledge and are highly reproducible due to their primer length and the high stringency achieved by the annealing temperature (Guo et al, 2014b). Indeed, this marker system has been used successfully for several genetic diversity studies in plants, such as apricot (Baranek et al, 2012), Cicer species (Andeden et al, 2013), and Vitis vinifera (Guo et al, 2014a(Guo et al, , 2014b. Chen and Liu (2014) also reported that iPBS and start codon-targeted polymorphism markers are effective marker systems for discriminating genotypes in Myrica rubra.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%