IPOM: history of an acronym

Muysoms, Filip

doi:10.1007/s10029-018-1804-2

Cited by 16 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…There is acceptable evidence that umbilical and epigastric hernias can be repaired safely using a synthetic polypropylene mesh 30,37,48,60,61 . Similar to incisional hernias, there are five theoretical anatomical layers for mesh placement: onlay, in the prefascial plane above the linea alba; fixing the mesh to the borders of the repair (inlay plug); retromuscular, between the rectus muscle and the posterior rectus sheath; preperitoneal, between the posterior rectus sheath and the peritoneum; and intraperitoneal, also called intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) 62,63 .…”

Section: Quality Of Evidence: Strength Of Recommendation: Weakmentioning

confidence: 99%

Guidelines for treatment of umbilical and epigastric hernias from the European Hernia Society and Americas Hernia Society

Henriksen

Montgomery

Kaufmann

et al. 2020

British Journal of Surgery

227

198

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Umbilical and epigastric hernia repairs are frequently performed surgical procedures with an expected low complication rate. Nevertheless, the optimal method of repair with best short-and long-term outcomes remains debatable. The aim was to develop guidelines for the treatment of umbilical and epigastric hernias. Methods: The guideline group consisted of surgeons from Europe and North America including members from the European Hernia Society and the Americas Hernia Society. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) critical appraisal checklists, and the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) instrument were used. A systematic literature search was done on 1 May 2018, and updated on 1 February 2019. Results: Literature reporting specifically on umbilical and epigastric hernias was limited in quantity and quality, resulting in a majority of the recommendations being graded as weak, based on low-quality evidence. The main recommendation was to use mesh for repair of umbilical and epigastric hernias to reduce the recurrence rate. Most umbilical and epigastric hernias may be repaired by an open approach with a preperitoneal flat mesh. A laparoscopic approach may be considered if the hernia defect is large, or if the patient has an increased risk of wound morbidity. Conclusion: This is the first European and American guideline on the treatment of umbilical and epigastric hernias. It is recommended that symptomatic umbilical and epigastric hernias are repaired by an open approach with a preperitoneal flat mesh.

show abstract

Section: Quality Of Evidence: Strength Of Recommendation: Weakmentioning

confidence: 99%

Guidelines for treatment of umbilical and epigastric hernias from the European Hernia Society and Americas Hernia Society

Henriksen

Montgomery

Kaufmann

et al. 2020

British Journal of Surgery

227

198

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The reason behind this could be multiple stress to abdominal wall or surgical procedure involved in delivery 14 . Traditionally the laparoscopic technique needs mesh which cover peritoneal cavity as seen on this study as well with pre-suture closing [15][16][17] . The present study results showed that laparoscopic procedure had short hospital stay, less chances of recurrence and minimal wound infection chances.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair versus Open Hernioplasty

Shakir¹,

Sadiq²,

Khan³

et al. 2021

PJMHS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Ventral hernia repair is the most common and usual procedure which applies various treatment approaches. Aim: To compare the laparoscopic ventral hernia repair surgery with open surgical procedure. Study design: Prospective comparative study Place and duration of study: Department of Surgery Unit-II, Fatima Memorial Hospital, Shadman Lahore from 1stJuly 2016 to 1st March 2021. Methodology: Ninety six patients who underwent either open or laparoscopic surgery. They were divided in two groups. Group A (n=40) was of open surgery and Group B (n=56) was laparoscopic. Patients’ demographic and clinical information was documented, postoperative pain, wound healing, duration of hospital stay, and recurrence rate was also recorded. Results: There were 43 males and 53 females. The mean age of patients was 52.2±14 years. The mean fascial defect size was 6.94±0.3 cm2. Majority of patients were obese. The postoperative study analysis revealed no wound infections and reduced hospital stay in laparoscopic operated patients than open surgery operated cases. Conclusion: Laparoscopic surgery is much safer and more efficient than open surgery protocol for ventral hernia repair in context to wound infection and postoperative complications. Keywords: Ventral hernia, Laparoscopic, Open surgery

show abstract

“…Traditionally, a laparoscopic ventral hernia repair has been performed with an intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM). With this procedure, a coated mesh is placed intra-peritoneally and fixated with tackers [ 10 ]. The procedure is easy to learn with good short-term outcomes; however, concerns about long-term complications to the intraperitoneal mesh and chronic pain due to mesh fixations have arisen [ 11 , 12 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Short-term outcomes after open versus robot-assisted repair of ventral hernias: a nationwide database study

Henriksen,

Helgstrand,

Jensen

2023

Hernia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The robotic platform is widely implemented; however, evidence evaluating outcomes of robotic ventral hernia repair is still lacking. The aim of the study was to evaluate the short-term outcomes after open and robot-assisted repair of primary ventral and incisional hernias. Methods Nationwide register-based cohort study with data from the Danish Ventral Hernia Database and the National Danish Patients Registry was from January 1, 2017 to August 22, 2022. Robot-assisted ventral hernia repairs were propensity score matched 1:3 with open repairs according to the confounding variables defect size, Charlson comorbidity index score, and age. Logistic regression analyses were performed for factors associated with length of stay > 2 days, readmission, and reoperation within 90 days. Results A total of 528 and 1521 patients underwent robot-assisted and open repair, respectively. The mean length of hospital stay in days was 0.5 versus 2.1 for robot-assisted and open approach, respectively (P < 0.001) and open approach was correlated with risk of length of stay > 2 days (OR 23.25, CI 13.80–39.17, P < 0.001). The incidence of readmission within 90 days of discharge was significantly lower after robot-assisted repair compared to open approach (6.2% vs. 12.1%, P < 0.001). Open approach was independently associated with increased risk of readmission (OR 21.43, CI 13.28–39.17, P = 0.005, P < 0.001). Conclusion Robot-assisted ventral hernia repair is safe and feasible and associated with shorter length of stay and decreased risk of readmission compared with open ventral hernia repair.

show abstract

IPOM: history of an acronym

Cited by 16 publications

References 13 publications

Guidelines for treatment of umbilical and epigastric hernias from the European Hernia Society and Americas Hernia Society

Guidelines for treatment of umbilical and epigastric hernias from the European Hernia Society and Americas Hernia Society

Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair versus Open Hernioplasty

Short-term outcomes after open versus robot-assisted repair of ventral hernias: a nationwide database study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About