2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jorganchem.2006.01.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ipso-and para-Functionalization of meta-terphenyl ligands with substituted methyl groups: Unusual head-to-tail coupling of terphenyl moieties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The molecular structure of 1 is shown in Figure 3 and selected bond distances and angles for 1 along with those of structurally close compounds shown in Figure 4, are given in Table 2. 51 Compound 1 is an iodo derivative of the bulky amine, I and the C-I distance (2.122(2) Å) in 1 is comparable to that in II (2.111(4) Å) and III (2.115(3) Å) as well as to the C-I distances reported in similar compounds in literature (Figure 1). [52][53][54][55] The C(2)-C(8) and C(6)-C(21) distances in 1 (1.529(3) and 1.528(3) Å) are longer as compared to those in II (1.497(5) and 1.502(3) Å) and III (1.497(2) Å), as in the first compound, they correspond to C(aryl)-C(alkyl) bond whereas in the latter two they correspond to C(aryl)-C(aryl) bond.…”
Section: Molecular Structuressupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The molecular structure of 1 is shown in Figure 3 and selected bond distances and angles for 1 along with those of structurally close compounds shown in Figure 4, are given in Table 2. 51 Compound 1 is an iodo derivative of the bulky amine, I and the C-I distance (2.122(2) Å) in 1 is comparable to that in II (2.111(4) Å) and III (2.115(3) Å) as well as to the C-I distances reported in similar compounds in literature (Figure 1). [52][53][54][55] The C(2)-C(8) and C(6)-C(21) distances in 1 (1.529(3) and 1.528(3) Å) are longer as compared to those in II (1.497(5) and 1.502(3) Å) and III (1.497(2) Å), as in the first compound, they correspond to C(aryl)-C(alkyl) bond whereas in the latter two they correspond to C(aryl)-C(aryl) bond.…”
Section: Molecular Structuressupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The analogous stretches in the bulkier 2 appeared at 3563 and 3522 cm −1 . In contrast, only a single O-H stretch was reported for the related benzyl alcohols 2,6-bis(2,6-dimethylphenyl)benzyl alcohol at 3522 cm −1 [6] and 2,6-bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)benzyl alcohol at 3569 cm −1 [7] or 3560 cm −1 [10], suggesting differences in hydrogen bonding. Hydrogen-bonded OH groups of alcohols typically have IR stretches in the range of 3550 to 3200 cm −1 , so it seemed likely that 1 would exhibit these interactions, while 2, which is closer to the range of isolated OH groups (3700 to 3584 cm −1 ), would not [11].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…) and dictyoterphenyl 6 (from the cellular slime mold Dictyosteliumdiscoideum ) . Possible applications of m -terphenyl derivatives as ligands in catalysis and as versatile synthetic materials have been extensively explored in recent years (Figure ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%