IPv4 and IPv6 Protocols: A Comparative Performance Study

Zakari, Abubakar; Musa, Maryam; Bekaroo, Girish; Bala, Surayya Ado; Hashem, Mohamed; Hakak, Saqib

doi:10.1109/icsgrc.2019.8837050

Cited by 7 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The performance of IPv6 and IPv4 under LAN and wireless LAN was considered in [16,17]. In [16], voice and video traffic on dual-stack networks were measured.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The performance of IPv6 and IPv4 under LAN and wireless LAN was considered in [16,17]. In [16], voice and video traffic on dual-stack networks were measured. Reference [17] analyzed the dual-stack mechanism on the wireless LAN as well as native IPv4 and IPv6 performance.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A hop count measurement was performed to find the total number of routers that pass through to access the dual-stack sites. The hop count result was obtained by using the tracert [16] utility.…”

Section: Hop Countmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Empirical Analysis of IPv4 and IPv6 Networks through Dual-Stack Sites

Wong

2021

Information

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IPv6 is the most recent version of the Internet Protocol (IP), which can solve the problem of IPv4 address exhaustion and allow the growth of the Internet (particularly in the era of the Internet of Things). IPv6 networks have been deployed for more than a decade, and the deployment is still growing every year. This empirical study was conducted from the perspective of end users to evaluate IPv6 and IPv4 performance by sending probing traffic to 1792 dual-stack sites around the world. Connectivity, packet loss, hop count, round-trip time (RTT), and throughput were used as performance metrics. The results show that, compared with IPv4, IPv6 has better connectivity, lower packet loss, and similar hop count. However, compared with IPv4, it has higher latency and lower throughput. We compared our results with previous studies conducted in 2004, 2007, and 2014 to investigate the improvement of IPv6 networks. The results of the past 16 years have shown that the connectivity of IPv6 has increased by 1–4%, and the IPv6 RTT (194.85 ms) has been greatly reduced, but it is still longer than IPv4 (163.72 ms). The throughput of IPv6 is still lower than that of IPv4.

show abstract

“…The performance of IPv6 and IPv4 under LAN and wireless LAN was considered in [16,17]. In [16], voice and video traffic on dual-stack networks were measured.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Empirical Analysis of IPv4 and IPv6 Networks through Dual-Stack Sites

Wong

2021

Information

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…According to Dliyauddin and Muslim (2019), in research comparing the performance analysis between IKEv2 and OpenVPN, the IKEv2 protocol performs better at a maximum load of 1536 bytes compared to the performance of the OpenVPN protocol. Zakari et al (2019), which compares IPv4 and IPv6 protocols, show that IPv6 is robust and has performed better than IPv4 on both experimental modes (voice and video).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This number is not adequate to anticipate the development of internet users today, which is remarkable, coupled with the development of future Telecommunication technology based on IP. IPv6 is a new internet protocol developed to anticipate the soon-to-be full IPv4 protocol (Zakari et al, 2019).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative Analysis of IPv4 and IPv6 OpenVPN Protocol Performance Based on QoS Parameters

Kristianto

Putra²

2021

J. Adv. Inf. Syst. Tech

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Network security is still a big concern in data exchange because it involves users' data privacy. There are several ways to secure data exchange on the internet. One of them uses a Virtual Private Network (VPN), which functions as a tunnel in the public internet that securely connects users to the local network. This research will analyze the performance of the OpenVPN IPv4 and IPv6 protocols. The method used to determine the performance results is based on the QoS parameters. The performance analysis results obtained are throughput OpenVPN IPv6 is better, namely 198.155 Kbps on ICMP data packets, 35.704 Kbps on FTP data packets, and 17.698 on TCP data packets. The delay value of OpenVPN in IPv4 is superior, namely 1.4s for ICMP data packets, and on IPv6, FTP data packages are superior with 0.1s. Jitter values indicate OpenVPN IPv6 is better with similar results. Packet loss values on OpenVPN for both IPv4 and IPv6 protocols are 0%. Based on these results, throughput IPv6 OpenVPN on ICMP data packets and delay on FTP data packets is better than IPv4 OpenVPN.

show abstract

Cloud Computing Model on Wireless Ad Hoc Network Using Clustering Mechanism for Smart City Applications

Thirumurugan

Gnanadurai²

2021

Immersive Technology in Smart Cities

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IPv4 and IPv6 Protocols: A Comparative Performance Study

Cited by 7 publications

References 6 publications

Empirical Analysis of IPv4 and IPv6 Networks through Dual-Stack Sites

Empirical Analysis of IPv4 and IPv6 Networks through Dual-Stack Sites

Comparative Analysis of IPv4 and IPv6 OpenVPN Protocol Performance Based on QoS Parameters

Cloud Computing Model on Wireless Ad Hoc Network Using Clustering Mechanism for Smart City Applications

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About