2019
DOI: 10.3390/ijms21010075
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

iQSP: A Sequence-Based Tool for the Prediction and Analysis of Quorum Sensing Peptides Using Informative Physicochemical Properties

Abstract: Understanding of quorum-sensing peptides (QSPs) in their functional mechanism plays an essential role in finding new opportunities to combat bacterial infections by designing drugs. With the avalanche of the newly available peptide sequences in the post-genomic age, it is highly desirable to develop a computational model for efficient, rapid and high-throughput QSP identification purely based on the peptide sequence information alone. Although, few methods have been developed for predicting QSPs, their predict… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where Ac, Sn, Sp and MCC are accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and Matthews correlation coefficient, respectively. More details of these four standard metrics can be found in our previous studies [25,26,[41][42][43][44][45]. Furthermore, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to assess the predictive performance, where AUC values of 0.5 and 1 were indicative of random and perfect models, respectively.…”
Section: Models' Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where Ac, Sn, Sp and MCC are accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and Matthews correlation coefficient, respectively. More details of these four standard metrics can be found in our previous studies [25,26,[41][42][43][44][45]. Furthermore, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to assess the predictive performance, where AUC values of 0.5 and 1 were indicative of random and perfect models, respectively.…”
Section: Models' Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to make a fair comparison, the DT, LR, MLP, NB, XGB, and SVM models were constructed based on the same feature set (the combination of baseline+pelvicme+utmet) using Scikit-Learn package [46]. This package has been successfully applied to various domains [25,[41][42][43][44][45]. To demonstrate the comparative results clearly, we summarized the Ac, Sn, Sp, MCC and AUC values for iPMI-Power, iPMI-Econ and other ML classifiers assessed via 10-fold cross-validation (Table S2 and Figure 1E) and independent tests (Table 3 and Figure 1F).…”
Section: Comparison Of Ipmi With Other ML Classifiersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PCPs are one of the most intuitive features associated with biophysical and biochemical reactions. Previously, our studies utilized these features for predicting and analyzing various functions of proteins and peptides from primary sequences [17,19,20,26,28,29,32,33,67]. In fact, there are 544 PCPs of amino acids extracted from the amino acid index database (AAindex) [37], which is a collection of published literature as well as different biochemical and biophysical properties of amino acids.…”
Section: Characterization Of Phage Virion Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We carried out 10-fold CV test to assess model performance. In 10-fold CV, the benchmark dataset was randomly separated into 10 subgroups with roughly equal size [54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64], with each subgroup containing the same number of m6A and non-m6A samples [65,66]. One of the subgroups was considered as the validation set to assess the trained model and the remaining subgroups were used to train the model.…”
Section: Cross-validationmentioning
confidence: 99%