2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.abb.2015.04.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IR-spectroscopic characterization of an elongated OmpG mutant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The prominence of the penultimate strands in OMBB folding may explain unsuccessful attempts at design as well. For instance, the unsuccessful attempt to increase the number of strands in OmpG by duplicating the final hairpin pushed the penultimate hairpin out of the penultimate position(Korkmaz et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prominence of the penultimate strands in OMBB folding may explain unsuccessful attempts at design as well. For instance, the unsuccessful attempt to increase the number of strands in OmpG by duplicating the final hairpin pushed the penultimate hairpin out of the penultimate position(Korkmaz et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although an attempt to widen the barrel of OmpG using two strands at its C-terminus was not successful [30], duplication of two strands at the N-terminus of FhuA successfully increased both its pore size and diffusion kinetics[31]. Conversely, removing one and two strands from the middle of the VDAC1 barrel resulted in a smaller barrel [32].…”
Section: Outer Membrane Protein Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Duplication studies of OmpX also successfully folded, as long as the strands of the middle hairpin (strands 4 and 5) were included (Arnold, et al 2007). This may explain unsuccessful attempts as well; to create a 16-stranded barrel by adding to the C-terminus, the last hairpin was duplicated in the 14-stranded OmpG but IR studies revealed that this additional hairpin never formed as part of the barrel (Korkmaz, et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%