2018
DOI: 10.1163/24685623-12340048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Iranian Cities: Settlements and Water Management from Antiquity to the Islamic Period

Abstract: This article attempts a long-term perspective on cities and water from Late Antiquity to the early Islamic centuries (until ca. 1000 CE). It focuses on the question of how cities and their agricultural hinterland were supplied with water. The topography of the site, its geomorphological features, are shown to influence both the setup and subsequent history of the cities. The article uses two sets of examples, one chosen from the Iranian plateau where qanāt irrigation predominates, and the other one from Persia… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Issues with the water supply are often cited as a cause for decline. Paikent in the Bukhara oasis of Uzbekistan was significantly depopulated in the tenth to eleventh century and abandoned by the thirteenth due to issues with its water supply 70 , while later settlements at Merv were abandoned following an attack by the Emir of Bukhara in the mid-eighteenth century which damaged irrigation systems and disrupted water supply to the city and its agricultural hinterland 71 . The city of Dandanakan between the Merv and Tejen Oasis was completely abandoned by the midtwelfth century and perceived as a ruin by Yaqut, who blamed its desolation on raids by the nomadic Ghuzz 72 , although an unreliable water supply may also have sealed its fate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Issues with the water supply are often cited as a cause for decline. Paikent in the Bukhara oasis of Uzbekistan was significantly depopulated in the tenth to eleventh century and abandoned by the thirteenth due to issues with its water supply 70 , while later settlements at Merv were abandoned following an attack by the Emir of Bukhara in the mid-eighteenth century which damaged irrigation systems and disrupted water supply to the city and its agricultural hinterland 71 . The city of Dandanakan between the Merv and Tejen Oasis was completely abandoned by the midtwelfth century and perceived as a ruin by Yaqut, who blamed its desolation on raids by the nomadic Ghuzz 72 , although an unreliable water supply may also have sealed its fate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%