background: There remains an unmet need to identify molecular biomarkers in ewing sarcoma (es). We sought to assess the influence of the O 6 -methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation on response and progression-free survival (pFs) following initiation of irinotecan and temozolomide (IT), pFs following initiation of vincristine, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide alternating with ifosfamide and etoposide (VDC-Ie), and overall survival (Os).Materials and methods: Data of advanced es patients, treated with IT were retrospectively collected. patients were required to have progression after prior VDC-Ie. MGMT promoter methylation was assessed on non-decalcified Formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFpe) tissue using methylation sensitive restriction enzyme-quantitative pCr (Msre-qpCr). survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.results: A total of 20 es patients underwent MGMT promoter methylation testing, and were eligible for analysis. Five patients (25%) had methylated MGMT, whereas the remaining (15; 75%) had unmethylated promoter. Five (25%) had objective response to IT, with no observed difference by promoter methylation (p = 0.76). Median pFs from initiation of IT for methylated vs. unmethylated MGMT patients was 4.9 and 1.2 months, respectively, p = 0.69. Median pFs from date of initiation of VDC-Ie was significantly superior in the methylated group; 27.8 vs. 8.6 months, p = 0.034. Median Os was superior but not statistically significant in the methylated group. conclusion: MGMT-promoter methylation did not correlate with clinical activity or outcomes following the IT regimen for advanced es. however, methylated MGMT predicted significantly superior pFs following initiation of the standard VDC-Ie protocol.