IRIS Final Technical Progress Report

Carelli, Mario D.

doi:10.2172/816832

Cited by 6 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Carelli et al reported the development of an interference-free amperometric biosensor for the detection of biogenic amines in food products. 152 Commercially available diamino oxidase was used as the biocomponent and entrapped in glutaraldehyde on a electrosynthesized bilayer film. The electrode type (i.e., gold or platinum), enzyme immobilization procedure, and bilayer film each proved influential to the analytical response characteristics of the ensuing biosensor.…”

Section: Enzyme Biosensorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Electrochemical Sensors

2008

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This review covers publications related to electrochemical sensors that appeared in print during the years 2006 and 2007. The focus of the review is on the development of electrochemical sensing principles including potentiometric and chronopotentiometric sensors, reference electrodes, voltammetric sensors, and electrochemical biosensors.References were collected by searching electrochemical sensor-related work using ACS SciFinder and ISI Science Citation Index. In addition, the tables of contents of several analytical journals were reviewed manually to identify relevant articles. Only original and review articles written in English were considered. Patents, book chapters or book series, and conference proceedings or abstracts were not considered for this review. The number of references was limited to 200 and as a result only a fraction of relevant work is covered. Specifically, the review was written to focus on fundamental aspects of electrochemical sensor research emphasizing new chemical concepts and not simply the application of electrochemical sensors. On the basis of these guidelines, several hybrid systems whereby electrochemical detection schemes were combined with a separation technique such as microdialysis, electrophoresis, chromatography, and lab-on-a-chip were not included in this review.We ask that our readers note that our review is not a comprehensive coverage of the above topics, but rather a snapshot of research conducted over the past two years. Obviously, electrochemical sensor research is still expanding and of interest to a number of disciplines beyond traditional chemistry. As such, it was not possible to cover all manuscripts published. We apologize to the authors of manuscripts that were not included in this review. POTENTIOMETRIC SENSORS ReviewsBakker and Pretsch published a broad review on modern potentiometry describing techniques for improving sensor performance, miniaturizing sensor platforms, and expanding the application of potentiometric sensors for environmental trace analysis and biosensing (98 citations). 1 Likewise, Pretsch provided a general overview on ion-selective electrodes (ISEs) focusing on improving detection limits and understanding non-classical (i.e., non-equilibrium) potentiometry for monitoring clinical relevant polyions such as heparin and protamine (81 citations). 2 De Marco et al. reviewed ISE methodologies for the analysis of trace metals and anions (e.g., F − , CN − , NO 3 − , NO 2 − , and Cl − ) in environmental samples. 3

show abstract

Section: Enzyme Biosensorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Electrochemical Sensors

2008

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The most important related to IRIS, the SMR used as example, are widely discussed in [20]. From the international literature about the differential characteristics of the SMR with respect to LR, several external factors have been identified and summarized in Table 3.…”

Section: External Factors Identification: Small-medium Reactors Vs Lmentioning

confidence: 99%

Impact of the External Factors in the Nuclear Field: A Comparison Between Small Medium Reactors vs. Large Reactors

Mancini

Locatelli

Tammaro

2009

Volume 3: Thermal Hydraulics; Current Advanced Reactors: Plant Design, Construction, Workforce and Public Acceptance

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Several improvements have been made in the nuclear energy sector during the last decade leading to new design for advanced nuclear power plants. Literature presents several studies about the economics of these new Power Plants, however the economic analysis of these plants usually considers only the classical accounts related to Construction, Operation & Maintenance, Fuel and Decommissioning. Beside these accounts there are many factors, from now on named External Factors (e.g. social acceptability, enhanced safety, emergency planning zone reduction, etc.) able to heavily determine the profitability of the investment. This paper presents the differential impact of these External Factors on nuclear technology with different sizes. According to the classification currently in use in the IAEA, small reactors are those with electric generation power lower than 300 MW, while medium sized reactors are those with electric power between 300 and 700 MW [1]. We define “Small Medium Reactors” (SMR) reactors with an electrical output smaller than 700 MW (usually 335 MWe) and as “Large reactors”, (LR) reactors with an equivalent electric power greater than 700 MW. (usually 1340 MWe) Starting from the international literature point of view, the paper provides a list of external factors distinguished in economically quantifiable or not. Two different approaches have been used for their assessment: a monetary ranking and a strategic one. Then, using a Quality Function Deployment approach, a multi-attribute model is introduced to obtain a weight for every external factor, dividing their impacts into three sustainability dimensions (economic, environmental and social). The results show that the new SMR perform better than LR thanks to the smaller size which allows an enhancement of the safety level (which affects the public opinion) and a greater flexibility in the market.

show abstract

LQG/LTR Controller Design for Power Control of Small Pressurized Water Reactors Under Four Feedback-Controlled Strategies

Wan

Chen

et al. 2022

Nuclear Science and Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IRIS Final Technical Progress Report

Cited by 6 publications

References 10 publications

Electrochemical Sensors

Electrochemical Sensors

Impact of the External Factors in the Nuclear Field: A Comparison Between Small Medium Reactors vs. Large Reactors

LQG/LTR Controller Design for Power Control of Small Pressurized Water Reactors Under Four Feedback-Controlled Strategies

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About