2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.patrec.2015.12.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Iris recognition based on sparse representation and k-nearest subspace with genetic algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another method proposed by Ashok et al [16] makes use of the power of three classification types based on k-nearest distance, sparse display, and genetic algorithm. The experiments show that the false error rate (FER) of this method approximates is very low.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another method proposed by Ashok et al [16] makes use of the power of three classification types based on k-nearest distance, sparse display, and genetic algorithm. The experiments show that the false error rate (FER) of this method approximates is very low.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result of applying this transform to image signal consists of two complementary signals, namely, approximation and details. The former is a representation of low-frequency parts of image and the latter is a representation of highfrequency parts of image [16]. Therefore, repetitive application of DWT decomposes the image signal into different sub-bands so that the lower-frequency sub-bands have finer frequency resolution and coarser time resolution compared to the higher-frequency sub-bands.…”
Section: Wavelet Transformmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most important characteristics of the iris do not change the texture of the iris through a person life [30,31]. This stability of iris features over a long time, leading to guarantees the long period of validity of the data and it does not need to update; in addition, iris characteristics are well protected from the environment [32][33][34]. This advantage allows iris identification as the most accurate and reliable biometric identification [35][36][37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in contrast to other unsupervised techniques that are traditionally used, such as PCA, LPP and random projections. SRC is performed using our adaptive reduced‐set matching pursuit (ARMP) algorithm [13]. Other frameworks that employ SRC typically perform CS reconstruction using the computationally expensive ℓ 1 minimisation such as those in [9, 14]. In contrast, ARMP is an efficient CS reconstruction algorithm that significantly improves the speed of SRC while it maintains the same accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%