2005
DOI: 10.1007/11608288_61
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Iris Recognition in Mobile Phone Based on Adaptive Gabor Filter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be mainly due to the highly constrained nature of iris recognition systems as well as the inability of existing smartphone cameras to produce adequate quality images for reliable iris recognition performance. One early work in this field shows a cold mirror with IR pass filter (750nm) attached on a Samsung SPH-S2300 camera-phone with 2048 × 1536 pixel CCD sensor and 3x optical zoom [14]. Later Cho, Park, and Rhee [13] improved the localization of pupil and iris regions for the same system.…”
Section: Review Of Related Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be mainly due to the highly constrained nature of iris recognition systems as well as the inability of existing smartphone cameras to produce adequate quality images for reliable iris recognition performance. One early work in this field shows a cold mirror with IR pass filter (750nm) attached on a Samsung SPH-S2300 camera-phone with 2048 × 1536 pixel CCD sensor and 3x optical zoom [14]. Later Cho, Park, and Rhee [13] improved the localization of pupil and iris regions for the same system.…”
Section: Review Of Related Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This differs from its use on a typical smartphone with a single fixed camera, unconstrained eye positions and limited control of illumination conditions. Some studies have begun to appear that deal directly with the iris acquisition problems for mobile phones [15]- [18] but these do not consider the current state-of-art and tend to ignore optical and quality issues that are critical for successful iris region acquisition and iris segmentation.…”
Section: B Iris Technology -How Practical Is It?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biometrics complement or substitute the traditional methods which benefits from its features of safety, reliability and convenience. However, current biometric identification methods, such as face recognition [1], fingerprint identification [2], iris recognition [3] and handwritten signatures [4], have the drawbacks of requiring high cost of technology or specific hardware, or being affected by the surrounding environment easily. Meanwhile, the face, fingerprint, iris and signature are significant features that determine someone uniquely and cannot be changed or replaced anymore.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%