2021
DOI: 10.1016/s1872-2067(20)63686-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Iron-based binary metal-organic framework nanorods as an efficient catalyst for the oxygen evolution reaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The superior OER activity of the NiTe 2 /NF@CuFe catalyst was also verified by analyzing the electrochemical active surface area (ECSA) derived from electrochemical double layer capacitance (Cdl) values determined by cyclic voltammetry (CV) at various scan rates (10,20,30,40 Figures S10a,b and 8a reveal that the NiTe 2 /NF@CuFe catalyst has the largest Cdl value of 17.01 mF cm −2 , which is about two, four, and four times those of NiTe 2 /NF@Fe (8.23 mF cm −2 ; Figure S10g,h), NiTe 2 /NF@Cu (4.43 mF cm −2 ; Figure S10e,f), and NiTe 2 /NF (3.86 mF cm −2 ; Figure S10c,d). These obvious differences show that the introduction of Cu leads to an abundance of active sites that accelerate the OER.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The superior OER activity of the NiTe 2 /NF@CuFe catalyst was also verified by analyzing the electrochemical active surface area (ECSA) derived from electrochemical double layer capacitance (Cdl) values determined by cyclic voltammetry (CV) at various scan rates (10,20,30,40 Figures S10a,b and 8a reveal that the NiTe 2 /NF@CuFe catalyst has the largest Cdl value of 17.01 mF cm −2 , which is about two, four, and four times those of NiTe 2 /NF@Fe (8.23 mF cm −2 ; Figure S10g,h), NiTe 2 /NF@Cu (4.43 mF cm −2 ; Figure S10e,f), and NiTe 2 /NF (3.86 mF cm −2 ; Figure S10c,d). These obvious differences show that the introduction of Cu leads to an abundance of active sites that accelerate the OER.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 7d and summarized in TableS2.46−59 Clearly, the NiTe 2 /NF@CuFe catalyst exhibits robust OER activity in 1.0 M KOH.The superior OER activity of the NiTe 2 /NF@CuFe catalyst was also verified by analyzing the electrochemical active surface area (ECSA) derived from electrochemical double layer capacitance (Cdl) values determined by cyclic voltammetry (CV) at various scan rates(10,20,30,40, and 50 mV s −1 ) in the non-Faradaic potential region. The Cdl values shown in…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…A serious challenge for today’s AEMWE catalyst R&D is the correlation and translation from liquid-electrolyte, three-electrode catalyst screening setups to realistic MEA-based two-electrode single- or multicell electrolyzer setups. Even though there are promising laboratory-scale catalysts, a reliable quantitative performance prediction to scaled-up water electrolyzers of industrial design and power has remained challenging, unconsidered, and in the majority of studies unmentioned. , Only a few studies tackle the reasons for the performance differences between three-electrode setups, and two-electrode electrolyzer cell designs are often significant for various reasons . This work contributes to the difficulties in transferring a set of new OER catalysts from the three-electrode setup to realistic single electrolyzer cells.…”
Section: Morphology and Surface Composition Of Tunable Anion-interlac...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metal-Organic Frameworks (MOFs) are a type of inorganicorganic hybrid crystalline materials, composed of inorganic metal ions and organic ligands through coordination bonds, intermolecular forces or hydrogen bonds. [1][2][3] MOFs are a good building block and are widely used in the fields of photocatalytic, [4] drug delivery, [5] adsorption, [6] temperature sensors, [7,8] and corrosion protection. [9] Through different metal ions and organic ligands, they can flexibly and conveniently adjust their connection and surface functional groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%