2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.07.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Iron(II) binding by cereal beta-glucan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, the removal of phytate made oat ␤-glucan very susceptible to Fenton reactioninduced oxidative degradation. This correlates to results by Faure et al (2015) who have shown that the Fenton reaction rate was slower in oat ␤-glucan than in barley ␤-glucan, subsequently less oxidative degradation was found in oat ␤-glucan. The results also concur with our previous study which showed that the oat ␤-glucan samples had better retardation of lipid oxidation and iron binding ability than barely ␤-glucan, and the differences were largely explained by the amount of phytate in the samples .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consequently, the removal of phytate made oat ␤-glucan very susceptible to Fenton reactioninduced oxidative degradation. This correlates to results by Faure et al (2015) who have shown that the Fenton reaction rate was slower in oat ␤-glucan than in barley ␤-glucan, subsequently less oxidative degradation was found in oat ␤-glucan. The results also concur with our previous study which showed that the oat ␤-glucan samples had better retardation of lipid oxidation and iron binding ability than barely ␤-glucan, and the differences were largely explained by the amount of phytate in the samples .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…One main structural difference for oat and barley ␤-glucan is the DP3:DP4 ratio, which is higher for barley than for oats (Wood, Weisz, & Blackwell, 1994;Johansson, 2006). Faure, Koppenol, and Nyström (2015) have shown that oat ␤-glucan had a better iron binding ability than barley ␤-glucan which therefore reduced the hydroxyl radical formation and consequently hindered ␤-glucan oxidative degradation. Nonetheless, our recent study suggested that this difference may be related to the presence of residual phytate (myo-inositol-1,2,3,4,5,6-hexakis phosphate) rather than structural differences between ␤-glucan.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there is an abundance of literature about iron bioavailability in foods, only few studies investigate or discuss the role of the partly soluble dietary fibers such as β-glucan ( 24 , 25 , 40 , 65 ). However, it is nowadays an established fact that phytic acid plays a major role in the observed reduced bioavailability of the iron present in cereals and other vegetable food, as also confirmed by Wang et al ( 10 , 11 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences in iron-binding properties of commercial high-viscosity oat and barley β-glucan of high purity (>97%) were also assessed in a previous study ( 25 ). The kinetics of the Fenton reaction between iron(II) and hydrogen peroxide in 0.6% oat and barley β-glucan solutions at pH values 2.7 and 4.7 were measured.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The kinetic studies of the Fenton reaction of Faure et al in oat or barley BG solutions also showed that commercial oat BG slows down the Fenton reaction at pH 4.7 (120 M −1 s −1 ) compared to barley BG (220 M −1 s −1 ) or acetate buffer (280 M −1 s −1 ). 50 Interestingly, this complexation influence could not be observed with the oligomer model compounds, suggesting that all three bind iron similarly regardless of their monomer connectivity.…”
Section: Kinetics Of the Oxidative Degradation Of Bg Oligosaccharidesmentioning
confidence: 97%