1993
DOI: 10.1109/20.281221
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Iron loss of grain size controlled very thin grain-oriented silicon steels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This can be attributed to the variation of grain sizes. Because of the different effects of the grain size on the hysteresis losses and the classical eddy current losses which are the primary components in the total losses, there are optimum grain sizes for each frequency to give a minimum core loss [21,22]. Higher heat treatment temperature lead larger crystal grain size and make hysteresis loss decrease and eddy current loss increase [23].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This can be attributed to the variation of grain sizes. Because of the different effects of the grain size on the hysteresis losses and the classical eddy current losses which are the primary components in the total losses, there are optimum grain sizes for each frequency to give a minimum core loss [21,22]. Higher heat treatment temperature lead larger crystal grain size and make hysteresis loss decrease and eddy current loss increase [23].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This can be attributed to the variation of grain sizes. Kim et al [14] reported that the grain size had a different effect on the eddy current loss and hysteresis loss, which are the primary components in the total iron loss. So it has an optimum grain size for different frequencies to obtain a minimum iron loss.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As regards the smaller sizes of the domains of the 1300°C samples, the results obtained by Kim et al [16] are worth looking at. These authors have found that in Si-containing steels, the number of domain walls increases when the grain size goes down.…”
Section: Microstructural Characterisationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…TEM micrograph showing spinodal decomposition in the sample annealed at 500°C[16]. Dislocations in the austenite phase of the 50% cold-rolled sample.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%