“…Osteocytes are embedded within the hard-mineralized component of bone throughout life (exceptions being when released by fracture or during remodeling) (Robling & Bonewald 2020), providing them high preservation potential within fossil bones, which has been extensively documented in different clades of vertebrates (e.g., Bailleul et al 2019;Enlow & Brown 1956;Pawlicki & Nowogrodzka-Zagorska 1998;Schweitzer 2011;Schweitzer et al 2013;Surmik et al 2019). Similar preservation of osteocytes-and blood vessels-like has also been documented in fossil turtles, showing that their preservation is independent of geologic time, paleoenvironment, lithology, lineages, and latitude (Cadena 2016;Cadena et al 2013;Cadena & Schweitzer 2012 Something in common to all aforementioned studies are the analytical tools used to study and characterize these fossil bone microstructures, which include principally: 1) ground sections and observation under transmitted and polarized microscopy (Cadena & Schweitzer 2012;Surmik et al 2019); 2) bone demineralization using ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) as a chelating agent (0.5 M, pH 8.0), facilitating release the osteocytes-, blood vessels-, and any other cells-or soft-tissue fibers-like from the bone matrix for their posterior study by transmitted and/or polarized light, scanning and/or transmission electron microscopy and any coupled elemental analyzer, Raman spectroscopy, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), immunological and antibody studies (e.g., Alfonso-Rojas & Cadena 2020; Bailleul et al 2019Bailleul et al , 2020Cadena 2016;Saitta et al 2019;Schweitzer et al 2013;Surmik et al 2019;Wiemann et al 2018) The preservation of these soft-tissue microstructures (osteocytes and blood vessels) and their potential original constituents (proteins and DNA) has been questioned and considered a consequence of microbial interactions within fossil bone and its microenvironment or even as a result of cross-contamination in the laboratory (Buckley et al 2017;Kaye et al 2008;Saitta et al 2019). The 'biofilm hypothesis' as a source for soft-tissue preservation in dinosaur bones has been rigorously tested, which identified fundamental morphological, chemical and textural differences between the resultant biofilm structures and those derived from dinosaur bone, demonstrati...…”