Iron nanoparticles to recover a co-contaminated soil with Cr and PCBs

Abstract

Little attention has been given to the development of remediation strategies for soils polluted with mixture of pollution (metal(loid)s and organic compounds). The present study evaluates the effectiveness of different types of commercial iron nanoparticles (nanoscale zero valent iron (nZVI), bimetallic nZVI-Pd, and nano-magnetite (nFe3O4)), for the remediation of an industrial soil co-contaminated with Cr and PCBs. Soil samples were mixed with nZVI, nZVI-Pd, or nFe3O4 at doses selected according to their reactivity with PCBs, homogenized, saturated with water and incubated at controlled conditions for 15, 45 and 70 days. For each sampling time, PCBs and chromium were analyzed in aqueous and soil fractions. Cr(VI) and Cr leachability (TCLP test) were determined in the soil samples. The treatment with the three types of iron nanoparticles showed significant reduction in Cr concentration in aqueous extracts at the three sampling times (> 98%), compared to the control samples. The leachability of Cr in treated soil samples also decreased and was stable throughout the experiment. Results suggested that nZVI and nZVI-Pd immobilized Cr through adsorption of Cr(VI) on the shell and reduction to Cr(III). The mechanism of interaction of nFe3O4 and Cr(VI) included adsorption and reduction although its reducing character was lower than those of ZVI nanoparticles. PCBs significantly decreased in soil samples (up to 68%), after 15 days of treatment with the three types of nanoparticles. However, nFe3O4 evidenced reversible adsorption of PCBs after 45 days. In general, nZVI-Pd reduced PCB concentration in soil faster than nZVI. Control soils showed a similar reduction in PCBs concentration as those obtained with nZVI and nZVI-Pd after a longer time (45 days). This is likely due to natural bioremediation, although it was not effective for Cr remediation. Results suggest that the addition of nZVI or nZVI-Pd and pseudo-anaerobic conditions could be used for the recovery of soil co-contaminated with Cr and PCBs.

Sustainable Remediation of Soil and Water Utilizing Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi: A Review

“…In recent years, novel materials have been employed to break down PCBs in soil. Nanoscale zero-valent iron (nZVI) is highly effective in degrading PCBs in soil but may pose a threat to plants when used in conjunction with phytoremediation [45][46][47]. This will undoubtedly limit the efficiency of nZVI for PCB degradation.…”

The Role of Procedure Duration in the Sustainability Assessment of Contaminated Site Management in Italy

“…Technological screening is based on environmental and socioeconomic sustainability, and sustainable remediation projects require a thorough assessment of risk and site features [26][27][28]. In the European Union, there were around 2.8 million potentially contaminated sites in 2022 [29][30][31][32][33], highlighting the need for remediation due to its environmental, human health, and economic implications. Time is crucial for reducing threats, adhering to legal requirements, managing liabilities, limiting expenses, and improving property values [34].…”

Understanding Nanoscale Interactions between Minerals and Microbes: Opportunities for Green Remediation of Contaminated Sites

“…It is estimated that globally over 5 million brownfield sites require remediation and redevelopment . In the European Union alone, around 2.8 million contaminated sites have been reported, 14% of which require immediate remediation. , The global market for environmental remediation is projected to be of 189.1 billion US dollars by 2025 . Conventional site remediation technologies that rely on physical and chemical treatments (e.g., excavation, pump and treat, thermal desorption, and chemical oxidation) can be costly and energy-intensive .…”